Stonewood Design — Bath Architect Digital Visibility Score

Digital Visibility Score: 55 / 100 · Rank 25 of 80

Digital Visibility Score55/100Rank 25 of 80 · top 30%Problems found1Very little published contentFurthest behind-37Content & trust: 0 against a sector median of 37

Measured 31 August 2026 via the PYC Bath Architect Digital Visibility Index. Every figure is objective and reproducible from the methodology. Spotted an error? Request a correction.

Pillar breakdown vs sector median

Each pillar scored 0–100 against the sector median for this index. The final column is this firm's distance from that median.

Pillar	Score	Median	vs median
Speed & CWV	100	63	+37
Technical	100	88	+12
Local presence	59	78.5	−19.5
Visibility	21	0	+21
AI search presence	0	0	level
Content & trust	0	37	−37

Pillar performance against the sector median. Bars right of centre are above the median, left are below.

Speed & CWV		+37
Technical		+12
Local presence		-19.5
Visibility		+21
AI search presence		0
Content & trust		-37

Problems found

These are specific, checkable faults on the site — not opinions about it.

• Worth fixingVery little published contentThe homepage carries 16 words and the site links to no blog, news or insights section. There is little here for a search engine to match, or for an assistant to quote.

Where this firm ranks

Ranks for 5 of 12 keywords, average position 71.8, in the local 3-pack for 0 keywords.

Keyword	Position
architects Bath	#54
architect Bath	not in top 100
architectural services Bath	not in top 100
house extension architect Bath	not in top 100
planning application architect Bath	not in top 100
listed building architect Bath	#84
residential architects Bath	#63
commercial architects Bath	#84
self build architect Bath	not in top 100
loft conversion architect Bath	not in top 100
barn conversion architect Bath	not in top 100
conservation architect Bath	#74

The gap to the leader

This firm against the sector median and the index leader, Designscape Architects, on every pillar.

Speed & CWV		100
Technical		100
Local presence		59
Visibility		21
AI search presence		0
Content & trust		0

this firm sector median leader

Stonewood Design trails Designscape Architects by 176 points across 4 pillars, but 64% of that is AI search presence and Content & trust alone. It already matches or beats the leader on Speed & CWV, Technical.

AI search presence

Named in 0 of 5 AI answers. A domain citation is stronger evidence than a name mention.

✗	Who are the best architects in Bath?
✗	Which architect in Bath would you recommend for a house extension?
✗	Top rated architectural practices in Bath
✗	I need an architect in Bath - who should I contact?
✗	Conservation architects in Bath

Why this score

What each score is made of. Every input here is in the open dataset, so the arithmetic can be checked rather than taken on trust.

Pillar	Score	Made up of
Content & trust	0	about page: no · team page: no · credentials: no · blog or news: no · homepage: 16 words
Visibility	21	ranks for 5 of 12 keywords · average position 71.8 · local 3-pack: 0
Local presence	59	0 reviews · 0 new in 90 days
Technical	100	HTTPS: yes · page allows indexing: yes · robots.txt allows crawling: yes · sitemap: yes · structured data: yes

Key findings

• Local presence: 59/100, below the sector median of 78.5.
• Content & trust: 0/100, below the sector median of 37.

How this compares to the leader

Designscape Architects leads the index with 80/100. The largest gaps are: AI search presence (0 vs 60); Content & trust (0 vs 53); Visibility (21 vs 53).

Top fixes (ranked by impact)

1. Publish structured, citable content and entity schema so AI engines surface the business for core local queries.
2. Add about/team pages, and refresh stale content.
3. Build local landing pages for the core keyword basket to lift organic and local-pack appearance.

Firms ranked near this one

The firms nearest Stonewood Design in this ranking, beyond the two either side.

Firm	Rank	Score	Why it is here
Donald Insall Associates	#23	55/100	2 places above you
Feilden Clegg Bradley Studios	#27	54/100	2 places below you
Bath Heritage Building ltd	#22	56/100	3 places above you
Lynea Architects Ltd	#28	54/100	3 places below you

Context (not scored)

Recorded alongside the measurement to make it easier to judge, but carrying no weight in the Digital Visibility Score. See the methodology.

Companies House	No confident match on the registered name
Real-user speed (CrUX)	Too little traffic to appear in Chrome’s public dataset
Google profile detail	1 photo · unclaimed · no description · no hours listed
Backlinks	148 referring domains · 232 links · rank 139
Site structure	1 pages crawled · 16 internal links per page · reachable in: contact 1 click · 0% of links use a generic anchor · 68 sitemap pages not reachable by following links
Sitemap	68 URLs listed · declared in robots.txt · newest entry 49 days old · 5 of 5 sampled URLs resolve

Where to get this fixed

Stonewood Design’s lowest-scoring pillars among those we publish remediation guidance for:

• AI search presence (0/100) — read generative engine optimisation on getting named by the answer engines this pillar measures. Background on analysing this pillar: ai search presence.
• Content & trust (0/100) — read topical authority on how depth and coverage compound into citation-worthiness. Background on analysing this pillar: content & trust.

↑ Ranked aboveMarptree Design & Build limited#24 · 55/100 Full indexAll 80 firms ↓ Ranked belowThe conservation architecture practice#26 · 55/100

---

How this is measured: see the index methodology, and the statistical methods behind each pillar. This index is published by PYC; if you want this score moved, start here.