Skip to content

Lynea Architects Ltd — Bath Architect Digital Visibility Score

Digital Visibility Score: 54 / 100 · Rank 28 of 80

Measured 31 August 2026 via the PYC Bath Architect Digital Visibility Index. Every figure is objective and reproducible from the methodology. Spotted an error? Request a correction.

Each pillar scored 0–100 against the sector median for this index. The final column is this firm's distance from that median.
PillarScoreMedianvs median
Speed & CWV3363−30
Technical10088+12
Local presence9478.5+15.5
Visibility380+38
AI search presence00level
Content & trust2837−9
Pillar performance against the sector median. Bars right of centre are above the median, left are below.
Speed & CWV-30
Technical+12
Local presence+15.5
Visibility+38
AI search presence0
Content & trust-9
These are specific, checkable faults on the site — not opinions about it.
  • Worth fixingVery little published contentThe homepage carries 376 words and the site links to no blog, news or insights section. There is little here for a search engine to match, or for an assistant to quote.
  • Worth knowingThe site has not changed in a long timeThe homepage last reported a change 5.3 years ago.
Ranks for 7 of 12 keywords, average position 21.3, in the local 3-pack for 5 keywords.
KeywordPosition
architects Bath#17
architect Bathnot in top 100
architectural services Bath#10
house extension architect Bath#15
planning application architect Bath#40
listed building architect Bathnot in top 100
residential architects Bath#14
commercial architects Bath#24
self build architect Bath#29
loft conversion architect Bathnot in top 100
barn conversion architect Bathnot in top 100
conservation architect Bathnot in top 100
This firm against the sector median and the index leader, Designscape Architects, on every pillar.
Speed & CWV33
Technical100
Local presence94
Visibility38
AI search presence0
Content & trust28

this firm sector median leader

Lynea Architects Ltd trails Designscape Architects by 166 points across 4 pillars, but 76% of that is Speed & CWV and AI search presence alone. It already matches or beats the leader on Technical, Local presence.

Ranked between #11 and #20 — one page from the first, ordered by how close.
residential architects Bath#14
house extension architect Bath#15
architects Bath#17

3 positions sit between #11 and #20 — one page away, and the cheapest ranking work available to this firm.

Named in 0 of 5 AI answers. A domain citation is stronger evidence than a name mention.
Who are the best architects in Bath?
Which architect in Bath would you recommend for a house extension?
Top rated architectural practices in Bath
I need an architect in Bath - who should I contact?
Conservation architects in Bath
Google Business Profile.
Rating5 / 5
Reviews31
Locations1
Reviews in last 90 days0
Address matches websiteyes
Themes Google extracted from this business’s reviews, by how often customers raise them. Not scored — this is what people say, not how findable the business is.
  • planning process14
  • friendly staff10
  • planning permission4
  • detailed drawings2
  • clear communication2
  • thoroughness2
  • engaging staff2
  • responsiveness2
  • design phase2
  • personable2
What each score is made of. Every input here is in the open dataset, so the arithmetic can be checked rather than taken on trust.
PillarScoreMade up of
Content & trust28about page: yes · team page: no · credentials: no · blog or news: no · homepage: 376 words · last changed: 1928 days ago
Visibility38ranks for 7 of 12 keywords · average position 21.3 · local 3-pack: 5
Local presence9431 reviews · rated 5 · 0 new in 90 days
Technical100HTTPS: yes · page allows indexing: yes · robots.txt allows crawling: yes · sitemap: yes · structured data: yes
  • Speed & CWV: 33/100, below the sector median of 63.

Designscape Architects leads the index with 80/100. The largest gaps are: Speed & CWV (33 vs 99); AI search presence (0 vs 60); Content & trust (28 vs 53).

  1. Publish structured, citable content and entity schema so AI engines surface the business for core local queries.
  2. Add about/team pages, and refresh stale content.
  3. Cut mobile LCP below 2.5s (optimise images and remove render-blocking resources) — the biggest score and ranking lever.
The firms nearest Lynea Architects Ltd in this ranking, beyond the two either side.
FirmRankScoreWhy it is here
The conservation architecture practice#2655/1002 places above you
Collaborative Design and Build Ltd.#3052/1002 places below you
Stonewood Design#2555/1003 places above you
Dimension 22 Ltd#3152/1003 places below you
Recorded alongside the measurement to make it easier to judge, but carrying no weight in the Digital Visibility Score. See the methodology.
Companies HouseCompany 12892556 · 5.9 years old · active · SIC 71111
Real-user speed (CrUX)Too little traffic to appear in Chrome’s public dataset
Lighthouse (lab, mobile)Performance 40 · accessibility 89 · best practices 100 · SEO 92 — biggest losses: Avoid large layout shifts; Reduce unused CSS; Use efficient cache lifetimes
Google profile detail5 photos · claimed · has a description · hours listed · 0 of 31 reviews are one star
Backlinks44 referring domains · 87 links · rank 97 · 76 broken
Site structure1 pages crawled · 61 internal links per page · reachable in: contact 1 click, about 1 click, services 1 click · 0% of links use a generic anchor
Sitemapdeclared in robots.txt · no lastmod dates

Lynea Architects Ltd’s lowest-scoring pillars among those we publish remediation guidance for:


How this is measured: see the index methodology, and the statistical methods behind each pillar. This index is published by PYC; if you want this score moved, start here.