Skip to content

Collaborative Design and Build Ltd. — Bath Architect Digital Visibility Score

Digital Visibility Score: 52 / 100 · Rank 30 of 80

Measured 31 August 2026 via the PYC Bath Architect Digital Visibility Index. Every figure is objective and reproducible from the methodology. Spotted an error? Request a correction.

Each pillar scored 0–100 against the sector median for this index. The final column is this firm's distance from that median.
PillarScoreMedianvs median
Speed & CWV5963−4
Technical8888level
Local presence7678.5−2.5
Visibility00level
AI search presence00level
Content & trust7537+38
Pillar performance against the sector median. Bars right of centre are above the median, left are below.
Speed & CWV-4
Technical0
Local presence-2.5
Visibility0
AI search presence0
Content & trust+38
1 critical problem found. These are specific, checkable faults on the site — not opinions about it.
  • CriticalSearch engines are being told not to index this siteThe site’s own robots.txt disallows crawling. Until that changes, nothing else on this page can help — the pages cannot enter the index in the first place.
Ranks for 0 of 12 keywords, in the local 3-pack for 0 keywords.
KeywordPosition
architects Bathnot in top 100
architect Bathnot in top 100
architectural services Bathnot in top 100
house extension architect Bathnot in top 100
planning application architect Bathnot in top 100
listed building architect Bathnot in top 100
residential architects Bathnot in top 100
commercial architects Bathnot in top 100
self build architect Bathnot in top 100
loft conversion architect Bathnot in top 100
barn conversion architect Bathnot in top 100
conservation architect Bathnot in top 100
This firm against the sector median and the index leader, Designscape Architects, on every pillar.
Speed & CWV59
Technical88
Local presence76
Visibility0
AI search presence0
Content & trust75

this firm sector median leader

Collaborative Design and Build Ltd. trails Designscape Architects by 179 points across 5 pillars, but 63% of that is AI search presence and Visibility alone. It already matches or beats the leader on Content & trust.

Named in 0 of 5 AI answers. A domain citation is stronger evidence than a name mention.
Who are the best architects in Bath?
Which architect in Bath would you recommend for a house extension?
Top rated architectural practices in Bath
I need an architect in Bath - who should I contact?
Conservation architects in Bath
Google Business Profile.
Rating5 / 5
Reviews1
Locations1
Reviews in last 90 days0
Address matches websiteyes
What each score is made of. Every input here is in the open dataset, so the arithmetic can be checked rather than taken on trust.
PillarScoreMade up of
Content & trust75about page: yes · team page: yes · credentials: no · blog or news: yes · homepage: 470 words
Visibility0ranks for 0 of 12 keywords · local 3-pack: 0
Local presence761 reviews · rated 5 · 0 new in 90 days
Technical88HTTPS: yes · page allows indexing: yes · robots.txt allows crawling: no · sitemap: yes · structured data: yes
  • No pillar falls materially below the sector median this quarter.

Designscape Architects leads the index with 80/100. The largest gaps are: AI search presence (0 vs 60); Visibility (0 vs 53); Speed & CWV (59 vs 99).

  1. Build local landing pages for the core keyword basket to lift organic and local-pack appearance.
  2. Publish structured, citable content and entity schema so AI engines surface the business for core local queries.
  3. Cut mobile LCP below 2.5s (optimise images and remove render-blocking resources) — the biggest score and ranking lever.
The firms nearest Collaborative Design and Build Ltd. in this ranking, beyond the two either side.
FirmRankScoreWhy it is here
Lynea Architects Ltd#2854/1002 places above you
Flawless#3252/1002 places below you
Feilden Clegg Bradley Studios#2754/1003 places above you
Woolf Interior Architecture & Design#3352/1003 places below you
Recorded alongside the measurement to make it easier to judge, but carrying no weight in the Digital Visibility Score. See the methodology.
Companies HouseNo confident match on the registered name
Real-user speed (CrUX)Too little traffic to appear in Chrome’s public dataset
Lighthouse (lab, mobile)Performance 52 · accessibility 96 · best practices 41 · SEO 85 — biggest losses: Issues were logged in the `Issues` panel in Chrome Devtools; Minimize main-thread work; Document request latency
Google profile detail1 photo · claimed · has a description · no hours listed
Backlinks91 referring domains · 167 links · rank 141 · 8 broken
Site structure1 pages crawled · 50 internal links per page · reachable in: contact 1 click, about 1 click · 22% of links use a generic anchor · 6 sitemap pages not reachable by following links
Sitemap6 URLs listed · declared in robots.txt · newest entry 1411 days old · 5 of 5 sampled URLs resolve

Collaborative Design and Build Ltd.’s lowest-scoring pillars among those we publish remediation guidance for:


How this is measured: see the index methodology, and the statistical methods behind each pillar. This index is published by PYC; if you want this score moved, start here.