Skip to content

Flawless — Bath Architect Digital Visibility Score

Digital Visibility Score: 52 / 100 · Rank 32 of 80

Measured 31 August 2026 via the PYC Bath Architect Digital Visibility Index. Every figure is objective and reproducible from the methodology. Spotted an error? Request a correction.

Each pillar scored 0–100 against the sector median for this index. The final column is this firm's distance from that median.
PillarScoreMedianvs median
Speed & CWV7163+8
Technical10088+12
Local presence5978.5−19.5
Visibility40+4
AI search presence00level
Content & trust5337+16
Pillar performance against the sector median. Bars right of centre are above the median, left are below.
Speed & CWV+8
Technical+12
Local presence-19.5
Visibility+4
AI search presence0
Content & trust+16
These are specific, checkable faults on the site — not opinions about it.
  • Worth knowingThe site has not changed in a long timeThe homepage last reported a change 6 years ago.
Ranks for 1 of 12 keywords, average position 47, in the local 3-pack for 0 keywords.
KeywordPosition
architects Bathnot in top 100
architect Bathnot in top 100
architectural services Bathnot in top 100
house extension architect Bathnot in top 100
planning application architect Bathnot in top 100
listed building architect Bathnot in top 100
residential architects Bathnot in top 100
commercial architects Bathnot in top 100
self build architect Bath#47
loft conversion architect Bathnot in top 100
barn conversion architect Bathnot in top 100
conservation architect Bathnot in top 100
This firm against the sector median and the index leader, Designscape Architects, on every pillar.
Speed & CWV71
Technical100
Local presence59
Visibility4
AI search presence0
Content & trust53

this firm sector median leader

Flawless trails Designscape Architects by 168 points across 4 pillars, but 65% of that is AI search presence and Visibility alone. It already matches or beats the leader on Technical, Content & trust.

Named in 0 of 5 AI answers. A domain citation is stronger evidence than a name mention.
Who are the best architects in Bath?
Which architect in Bath would you recommend for a house extension?
Top rated architectural practices in Bath
I need an architect in Bath - who should I contact?
Conservation architects in Bath
What each score is made of. Every input here is in the open dataset, so the arithmetic can be checked rather than taken on trust.
PillarScoreMade up of
Content & trust53about page: yes · team page: no · credentials: no · blog or news: yes · homepage: 1,324 words · last changed: 2198 days ago
Visibility4ranks for 1 of 12 keywords · average position 47 · local 3-pack: 0
Local presence590 reviews · 0 new in 90 days
Technical100HTTPS: yes · page allows indexing: yes · robots.txt allows crawling: yes · sitemap: yes · structured data: yes
  • Local presence: 59/100, below the sector median of 78.5.

Designscape Architects leads the index with 80/100. The largest gaps are: AI search presence (0 vs 60); Visibility (4 vs 53); Local presence (59 vs 90).

  1. Publish structured, citable content and entity schema so AI engines surface the business for core local queries.
  2. Build local landing pages for the core keyword basket to lift organic and local-pack appearance.
  3. Add about/team pages, and refresh stale content.
The firms nearest Flawless in this ranking, beyond the two either side.
FirmRankScoreWhy it is here
Collaborative Design and Build Ltd.#3052/1002 places above you
Alex Tart Architects, Bath#3451/1002 places below you
Klas Hyllén Architecture#2953/1003 places above you
Lord Architecture Ltd#3551/1003 places below you
Recorded alongside the measurement to make it easier to judge, but carrying no weight in the Digital Visibility Score. See the methodology.
Companies HouseNo confident match on the registered name
Real-user speed (CrUX)Too little traffic to appear in Chrome’s public dataset
Lighthouse (lab, mobile)Performance 78 · accessibility 91 · best practices 78 · SEO 85 — biggest losses: Links are not crawlable; Links do not have descriptive text; Links do not have a discernible name
Google profile detail1 photo · unclaimed · no description · no hours listed
Backlinks13 referring domains · 63 links · rank 7 · 72 broken
Site structure1 pages crawled · 91 internal links per page · reachable in: contact 1 click, about 1 click · 11% of links use a generic anchor · 32 sitemap pages not reachable by following links
Sitemap32 URLs listed · declared in robots.txt · newest entry 486 days old · 5 of 5 sampled URLs resolve

Flawless’s lowest-scoring pillars among those we publish remediation guidance for:


How this is measured: see the index methodology, and the statistical methods behind each pillar. This index is published by PYC; if you want this score moved, start here.