Measured 31 August 2026 via the PYC Bath Architect Digital Visibility Index. Every figure is objective and reproducible from the methodology. Spotted an error? Request a correction.
This firm against the sector median and the index leader, Designscape Architects, on every pillar.
Speed & CWV
71
Technical
100
Local presence
59
Visibility
4
AI search presence
0
Content & trust
53
this firm sector median leader
Flawless trails Designscape Architects by 168 points across 4 pillars, but 65% of that is AI search presence and Visibility alone. It already matches or beats the leader on Technical, Content & trust.
Designscape Architects leads the index with 80/100. The largest gaps are: AI search presence (0 vs 60); Visibility (4 vs 53); Local presence (59 vs 90).
Recorded alongside the measurement to make it easier to judge, but carrying no weight in the Digital Visibility Score. See the methodology.
Companies House
No confident match on the registered name
Real-user speed (CrUX)
Too little traffic to appear in Chrome’s public dataset
Lighthouse (lab, mobile)
Performance 78 · accessibility 91 · best practices 78 · SEO 85 — biggest losses: Links are not crawlable; Links do not have descriptive text; Links do not have a discernible name
Google profile detail
1 photo · unclaimed · no description · no hours listed
1 pages crawled · 91 internal links per page · reachable in: contact 1 click, about 1 click · 11% of links use a generic anchor · 32 sitemap pages not reachable by following links
Sitemap
32 URLs listed · declared in robots.txt · newest entry 486 days old · 5 of 5 sampled URLs resolve
Visibility (4/100) — read topical authority on why ranking breadth across a sector beats chasing single terms. Background on analysing this pillar: visibility.