Skip to content

Sova Surveys Bath — Bath Architect Digital Visibility Score

Digital Visibility Score: 51 / 100 · Rank 39 of 80

Measured 31 August 2026 via the PYC Bath Architect Digital Visibility Index. Every figure is objective and reproducible from the methodology. Spotted an error? Request a correction.

Each pillar scored 0–100 against the sector median for this index. The final column is this firm's distance from that median.
PillarScoreMedianvs median
Speed & CWV6163−2
Technical8888level
Local presence7178.5−7.5
Visibility00level
AI search presence00level
Content & trust7037+33
Pillar performance against the sector median. Bars right of centre are above the median, left are below.
Speed & CWV-2
Technical0
Local presence-7.5
Visibility0
AI search presence0
Content & trust+33
These are specific, checkable faults on the site — not opinions about it.
  • Worth fixingStructured data present, but no LocalBusiness markupThe page describes something to machines, but not that it is a local business with an address and opening hours.
  • Worth knowingThe site has not changed in a long timeThe homepage last reported a change 5.4 years ago.
Ranks for 0 of 12 keywords, in the local 3-pack for 0 keywords.
KeywordPosition
architects Bathnot in top 100
architect Bathnot in top 100
architectural services Bathnot in top 100
house extension architect Bathnot in top 100
planning application architect Bathnot in top 100
listed building architect Bathnot in top 100
residential architects Bathnot in top 100
commercial architects Bathnot in top 100
self build architect Bathnot in top 100
loft conversion architect Bathnot in top 100
barn conversion architect Bathnot in top 100
conservation architect Bathnot in top 100
This firm against the sector median and the index leader, Designscape Architects, on every pillar.
Speed & CWV61
Technical88
Local presence71
Visibility0
AI search presence0
Content & trust70

this firm sector median leader

Sova Surveys Bath trails Designscape Architects by 182 points across 5 pillars, but 62% of that is AI search presence and Visibility alone. It already matches or beats the leader on Content & trust.

Named in 0 of 5 AI answers. A domain citation is stronger evidence than a name mention.
Who are the best architects in Bath?
Which architect in Bath would you recommend for a house extension?
Top rated architectural practices in Bath
I need an architect in Bath - who should I contact?
Conservation architects in Bath
Google Business Profile.
Rating3 / 5
Reviews2
Locations1
Reviews in last 90 days1
Address matches websiteyes
What each score is made of. Every input here is in the open dataset, so the arithmetic can be checked rather than taken on trust.
PillarScoreMade up of
Content & trust70about page: yes · team page: yes · credentials: no · blog or news: yes · homepage: 1,232 words · last changed: 1956 days ago
Visibility0ranks for 0 of 12 keywords · local 3-pack: 0
Local presence712 reviews · rated 3 · 1 new in 90 days
Technical88HTTPS: yes · page allows indexing: yes · robots.txt allows crawling: yes · sitemap: yes · structured data: yes
  • No pillar falls materially below the sector median this quarter.

Designscape Architects leads the index with 80/100. The largest gaps are: AI search presence (0 vs 60); Visibility (0 vs 53); Speed & CWV (61 vs 99).

  1. Build local landing pages for the core keyword basket to lift organic and local-pack appearance.
  2. Publish structured, citable content and entity schema so AI engines surface the business for core local queries.
  3. Cut mobile LCP below 2.5s (optimise images and remove render-blocking resources) — the biggest score and ranking lever.
The firms nearest Sova Surveys Bath in this ranking, beyond the two either side.
FirmRankScoreWhy it is here
Sims Hilditch#3751/1002 places above you
Jonathan Logsdon Architect#4150/1002 places below you
Paragon Structures#3651/1003 places above you
The Curator's House Interior Design#4250/1003 places below you
Recorded alongside the measurement to make it easier to judge, but carrying no weight in the Digital Visibility Score. See the methodology.
Companies HouseNo confident match on the registered name
Real-user speed (CrUX)Too little traffic to appear in Chrome’s public dataset
Lighthouse (lab, mobile)Performance 82 · accessibility 93 · best practices 100 · SEO 85 — biggest losses: Links do not have descriptive text; LCP breakdown; SVG elements with an `img` role do not have an accessible text alternative
Google profile detail11 photos · claimed · has a description · hours listed
Backlinks108 referring domains · 360 links · rank 177
Site structure25 pages crawled · 99.1 internal links per page · reachable in: contact 1 click, about 1 click, services 1 click · 1% of links use a generic anchor
Sitemap13 URLs listed · declared in robots.txt · newest entry 6 days old · 5 of 5 sampled URLs resolve

Sova Surveys Bath’s lowest-scoring pillars among those we publish remediation guidance for:


How this is measured: see the index methodology, and the statistical methods behind each pillar. This index is published by PYC; if you want this score moved, start here.