Measured 31 August 2026 via the PYC Bath Architect Digital Visibility Index. Every figure is objective and reproducible from the methodology. Spotted an error? Request a correction.
These are specific, checkable faults on the site — not opinions about it.
Worth fixingVery little published contentThe homepage carries 394 words and the site links to no blog, news or insights section. There is little here for a search engine to match, or for an assistant to quote.
This firm against the sector median and the index leader, Designscape Architects, on every pillar.
Speed & CWV
53
Technical
100
Local presence
87
Visibility
0
AI search presence
0
Content & trust
30
this firm sector median leader
Sims Hilditch trails Designscape Architects by 185 points across 5 pillars, but 61% of that is AI search presence and Visibility alone. It already matches or beats the leader on Technical.
Largest Contentful Paint measured two ways: one throttled lab run, against 28 days of real Chrome users.
Lab (Lighthouse, mobile)
52.1s
one throttled load on a datacentre machine
Field (real users)
2.3s
75th percentile of actual Chrome visitors over 28 days
The lab figure is 22.8× the real-user figure. The lab test rates this site poorly, but real visitors are not experiencing it that way — Core Web Vitals pass on field data. Treat a low lab score here as a lead to investigate, not a fault to pay to fix.
Sims Hilditch’s lowest-scoring pillars among those we publish remediation guidance for:
Visibility (0/100) — read topical authority on why ranking breadth across a sector beats chasing single terms. Background on analysing this pillar: visibility.