Skip to content

Smartarch Ltd — Bath Architect Digital Visibility Score

Digital Visibility Score: 51 / 100 · Rank 38 of 80

Measured 31 August 2026 via the PYC Bath Architect Digital Visibility Index. Every figure is objective and reproducible from the methodology. Spotted an error? Request a correction.

Each pillar scored 0–100 against the sector median for this index. The final column is this firm's distance from that median.
PillarScoreMedianvs median
Speed & CWV5963−4
Technical8888level
Local presence6778.5−11.5
Visibility40+4
AI search presence00level
Content & trust8037+43
Pillar performance against the sector median. Bars right of centre are above the median, left are below.
Speed & CWV-4
Technical0
Local presence-11.5
Visibility+4
AI search presence0
Content & trust+43
These are specific, checkable faults on the site — not opinions about it.
  • Worth fixingStructured data present, but no LocalBusiness markupThe page describes something to machines, but not that it is a local business with an address and opening hours.
Ranks for 1 of 12 keywords, average position 54, in the local 3-pack for 0 keywords.
KeywordPosition
architects Bathnot in top 100
architect Bathnot in top 100
architectural services Bathnot in top 100
house extension architect Bathnot in top 100
planning application architect Bathnot in top 100
listed building architect Bathnot in top 100
residential architects Bathnot in top 100
commercial architects Bath#54
self build architect Bathnot in top 100
loft conversion architect Bathnot in top 100
barn conversion architect Bathnot in top 100
conservation architect Bathnot in top 100
This firm against the sector median and the index leader, Designscape Architects, on every pillar.
Speed & CWV59
Technical88
Local presence67
Visibility4
AI search presence0
Content & trust80

this firm sector median leader

Smartarch Ltd trails Designscape Architects by 184 points across 5 pillars, but 59% of that is AI search presence and Visibility alone. It already matches or beats the leader on Content & trust.

Named in 0 of 5 AI answers. A domain citation is stronger evidence than a name mention.
Who are the best architects in Bath?
Which architect in Bath would you recommend for a house extension?
Top rated architectural practices in Bath
I need an architect in Bath - who should I contact?
Conservation architects in Bath
What each score is made of. Every input here is in the open dataset, so the arithmetic can be checked rather than taken on trust.
PillarScoreMade up of
Content & trust80about page: yes · team page: yes · credentials: yes · blog or news: no · homepage: 1,046 words
Visibility4ranks for 1 of 12 keywords · average position 54 · local 3-pack: 0
Local presence670 reviews · 0 new in 90 days
Technical88HTTPS: yes · page allows indexing: yes · robots.txt allows crawling: yes · sitemap: yes · structured data: yes
  • Local presence: 67/100, below the sector median of 78.5.

Designscape Architects leads the index with 80/100. The largest gaps are: AI search presence (0 vs 60); Visibility (4 vs 53); Speed & CWV (59 vs 99).

  1. Publish structured, citable content and entity schema so AI engines surface the business for core local queries.
  2. Build local landing pages for the core keyword basket to lift organic and local-pack appearance.
  3. Cut mobile LCP below 2.5s (optimise images and remove render-blocking resources) — the biggest score and ranking lever.
The firms nearest Smartarch Ltd in this ranking, beyond the two either side.
FirmRankScoreWhy it is here
Paragon Structures#3651/1002 places above you
Axon Architects#4050/1002 places below you
Lord Architecture Ltd#3551/1003 places above you
Jonathan Logsdon Architect#4150/1003 places below you
Recorded alongside the measurement to make it easier to judge, but carrying no weight in the Digital Visibility Score. See the methodology.
Companies HouseCompany 07782962 · 14.9 years old · active · SIC 71111
Real-user speed (CrUX)Too little traffic to appear in Chrome’s public dataset
Lighthouse (lab, mobile)Performance 60 · accessibility 96 · best practices 81 · SEO 100 — biggest losses: Reduce unused JavaScript; Improve image delivery; Font display
Google profile detail4 photos · claimed · has a description · hours listed
Backlinks46 referring domains · 1536 links · rank 65
Site structure1 pages crawled · 66 internal links per page · reachable in: contact 1 click, about 1 click · 6% of links use a generic anchor
Sitemapdeclared in robots.txt

Smartarch Ltd’s lowest-scoring pillars among those we publish remediation guidance for:


How this is measured: see the index methodology, and the statistical methods behind each pillar. This index is published by PYC; if you want this score moved, start here.