Cheltenham Law Firm Digital Visibility Index — Q4-2026
The PYC Cheltenham Law Firm Digital Visibility Index ranks 8 law firms in Cheltenham on how well they perform online — website speed, technical SEO, local presence, search visibility, AI search presence and content & trust — each scored 0–100 to a single Digital Visibility Score. Measured 3 October 2026 to the published methodology.
As of Q4-2026, 0% of the 6 law firms in Cheltenham measured on Speed & Core Web Vitals score below 50 on mobile (PYC Cheltenham Law Firm Digital Visibility Index, measured 3 October 2026).
Who owns the first page
Section titled “Who owns the first page”this index (16) directories, national chains and firms not indexed (104)
Ranking well but not currently indexed:
- reviewsolicitors.co.uk — 10 top-10 slots, best #2
- cdlaw.co.uk — 7 top-10 slots, best #1
- solicitors-barristers.co.uk — 5 top-10 slots, best #1
- legal-pages.co.uk — 4 top-10 slots, best #2
- tanners.co.uk — 4 top-10 slots, best #2
86.7% of the first page belongs to businesses outside this index — directories, national chains and local firms not tracked here. These firms are not mainly competing with each other.
The league table
Section titled “The league table”| # | Cheltenham Law Firm | Score | Spd | Tech | Local | Vis | AI | Cont |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | HCR Law | 70 | 81 | 100 | 72 | 32 | 40 | 87 |
| 2 | Willans | 67 | 80 | 33 | 91 | 48 | 80 | — |
| 3 | BPE Solicitors | 65 | 66 | 88 | 75 | 39 | 20 | 100 |
| 4 | Pembridge Solicitors | 60 | — | 88 | 83 | 17 | 20 | 83 |
| 5 | Davis Gregory | 58 | 58 | 88 | 98 | 10 | 0 | 80 |
| 6 | Hine Solicitors | 56 | — | 100 | 74 | 4 | 0 | 95 |
| 7 | Converse Law | 54 | 62 | 63 | 81 | 30 | 0 | 79 |
| 8 | Setfords Cheltenham | 54 | 89 | 88 | — | 4 | 0 | 70 |
Which keywords are contested, and which are open?
Section titled “Which keywords are contested, and which are open?”| law firms | best law firm | commercial solicitors | corporate law | employment law | dispute resolution | commercial property solicit… | litigation solicitors | business legal advice | law firms Montpellier | law firms Pittville | solicitors Montpellier | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HCR Law | 1 | 7 | 7 | 8 | ||||||||
| Willans | 5 | 11 | 5 | 1 | ||||||||
| BPE Solicitors | 12 | 8 | 1 | 14 | 6 | 9 | 3 | |||||
| Pembridge Solicitors | 62 | 8 | 15 | 7 | ||||||||
| Davis Gregory | 18 | 6 | ||||||||||
| Hine Solicitors | 40 | |||||||||||
| Converse Law | 3 | |||||||||||
| Setfords Cheltenham | 44 |
1–3 4–10 11–20 21+ absent
No firm in this index reaches the first page for “employment law Cheltenham”, “law firms Montpellier”, “law firms Pittville”. That is uncontested ground, and it is invisible in a league table.
Where each firm is visible
Section titled “Where each firm is visible”| Visible in | Firms | Which |
|---|---|---|
| All three channels | 1 | Willans |
| Organic + local pack | 2 | Davis Gregory, Converse Law |
| Organic + AI | 3 | HCR Law, BPE Solicitors, Pembridge Solicitors |
| Local pack + AI | 0 | — |
| Organic only | 0 | — |
| Local pack only | 0 | — |
| AI only | 0 | — |
| None of the three | 2 | Hine Solicitors, Setfords Cheltenham |
1 of 8 firms are visible in all three channels. 2 appear in none of them.
Search visibility against AI presence
Section titled “Search visibility against AI presence”horizontal: search visibility → vertical: AI presence ↑
Willans is the widest split: AI engines name it far more readily than search surfaces it (AI 80, visibility 48). Those are different problems behind a similar overall score.
Closest to the first page
Section titled “Closest to the first page”| Willans | Willans — employment law Cheltenham | #11 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| BPE Solicitors | BPE Solicitors — law firms Cheltenham | #12 | |
| BPE Solicitors | BPE Solicitors — employment law Cheltenham | #14 | |
| Pembridge Solicitors | Pembridge Solicitors — business legal advice Cheltenham | #15 | |
| Davis Gregory | Davis Gregory — commercial property solicitors Cheltenham | #18 |
5 winnable positions across 4 firms sit between #11 and #20 — one page off, and closer than any keyword the index does not already measure.
Reputation: reviews against rating
Section titled “Reputation: reviews against rating”horizontal: reviews (log) → vertical: rating ↑
Review volume spans 34 to 211 and ratings 3.4 to 4.9, yet the Local pillar separates these firms by only 26 points — the raw figures discriminate where the score does not. Most reviews: Willans (211). Highest rating: Pembridge Solicitors (4.9).
What the keyword basket is asking
Section titled “What the keyword basket is asking”| commercial | 12 of 12 |
|---|
Local pack coverage across the city
Section titled “Local pack coverage across the city”| NWnorth-west, 51.954, -2.167 — no indexed firm in the pack here | Nnorth, 51.954, -2.080 — no result at this point | NEnorth-east, 51.954, -1.993 — no result at this point |
| Wwest, 51.900, -2.167 — no indexed firm in the pack here | ·centre, 51.900, -2.080 — no indexed firm in the pack here | Eeast, 51.900, -1.993 — no indexed firm in the pack here |
| SWsouth-west, 51.846, -2.167 — no result at this point | 1Ssouth, 51.846, -2.080 — Willans | 2SEsouth-east, 51.846, -1.993 — Willans, Davis Gregory |
none 1 firm 2 3 of the pack
What changed since last quarter
Section titled “What changed since last quarter”| HCR Law | +67 | Technical | |
|---|---|---|---|
| BPE Solicitors | -40 | AI search presence | |
| Davis Gregory | +38 | Technical | |
| HCR Law | +32 | Visibility | |
| Willans | -32 | Visibility | |
| Pembridge Solicitors | -29 | Visibility | |
| Davis Gregory | -29 | Visibility | |
| Hine Solicitors | -29 | Visibility | |
| Setfords Cheltenham | -25 | Visibility | |
| Pembridge Solicitors | -20 | AI search presence | |
| Converse Law | -20 | AI search presence | |
| Setfords Cheltenham | -20 | AI search presence |
Hollow mark is Q3-2026, solid is Q4-2026. Showing the 12 largest of 27 changes. 17 readings unchanged and not drawn, across 8 firms that moved.
HCR Law moved furthest: Technical up 67 points since Q3-2026. 27 of 44 comparable readings changed at all — which is what a quarter of movement actually looks like.
Which law firm in Cheltenham has the best website?
Section titled “Which law firm in Cheltenham has the best website?”HCR Law tops the Q4-2026 index with a Digital Visibility Score of 70/100. Each firm has a full diagnostic scorecard linked from the table above.
How this is measured
Section titled “How this is measured”Every score follows the same six-pillar methodology: Speed & Core Web Vitals (20%), Technical foundation (20%), Local presence (20%), Visibility (15%), AI search presence (15%) and Content & trust (10%). Each pillar links to the knowledge-base article that explains what it measures; the statistical methods behind the scoring are written up separately. Download the full dataset: JSON · CSV.
Who publishes this
Section titled “Who publishes this”The index is compiled and published by PYC, a search consultancy run by Phil Yarrow. It exists because the questions it answers — who is actually visible in a local market, and by how much — were being answered with opinion. The collection and scoring code is open source, so any figure here can be recomputed rather than taken on trust.
Related reading on the practice behind the measurements: topical authority, generative engine optimisation, and case studies from comparable service businesses.
Using this data
Section titled “Using this data”This dataset is published under CC BY 4.0. You may reuse it, including commercially and in AI-generated answers, provided you credit Phil Yarrow (PYC) by name and link back. That credit is a condition of use, not a courtesy.
Phil Yarrow (PYC) — Local Digital Visibility Index. https://hub.pyc.agency/indices/
That one credit covers every dataset on this site — one figure or all of them. When quoting this particular dataset precisely, the fuller form is:
Phil Yarrow (PYC) — Local Digital Visibility Index: Cheltenham Law Firm, Q4-2026. https://hub.pyc.agency/indices/cheltenham-law-firms/
Full terms: licence and attribution.
Spotted an error? Request a correction.