Exeter Solicitor Digital Visibility Index — Q3-2026
The PYC Exeter Solicitor Digital Visibility Index ranks 8 exeter solicitors on how well they perform online — website speed, technical SEO, local presence, search visibility, AI search presence and content & trust — each scored 0–100 to a single Digital Visibility Score. Measured 27 August 2026 to the published methodology.
As of Q3-2026, 0% of the 8 exeter solicitors measured on Speed & Core Web Vitals score below 50 on mobile (PYC Exeter Solicitor Digital Visibility Index, measured 27 August 2026).
Who owns the first page
Section titled “Who owns the first page”this index (35) directories, national chains and firms not indexed (85)
Ranking well but not currently indexed:
- reviewsolicitors.co.uk — 10 top-10 slots, best #1
- rundlewalker.com — 8 top-10 slots, best #2
- duncanlewis.co.uk — 6 top-10 slots, best #3
- tozers.co.uk — 6 top-10 slots, best #3
- sleeblackwell.co.uk — 5 top-10 slots, best #2
70.8% of the first page belongs to businesses outside this index — directories, national chains and local firms not tracked here. These firms are not mainly competing with each other.
The league table
Section titled “The league table”| # | Exeter Solicitor | Score | Spd | Tech | Local | Vis | AI | Cont |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Dunn & Baker | 77 | 56 | 100 | 77 | 55 | 100 | 67 |
| 2 | Amicus Law | 75 | 73 | 100 | 78 | 46 | 100 | 33 |
| 3 | Gilbert Stephens | 73 | 77 | 100 | 77 | 60 | 40 | 67 |
| 4 | Stephens Scown | 70 | 59 | 100 | 78 | 43 | 60 | 67 |
| 5 | Wollens | 68 | 74 | 100 | 72 | 42 | 60 | 33 |
| 6 | Setfords Exeter | 66 | 89 | 100 | 65 | 38 | 20 | 67 |
| 7 | Porter Dodson | 59 | 67 | 88 | 61 | 42 | 40 | 33 |
| 8 | WBW Solicitors | 50 | 70 | 50 | 72 | 38 | 40 | 0 |
Which keywords are contested, and which are open?
Section titled “Which keywords are contested, and which are open?”| solicitors | best solicitors | conveyancing solicitors | family law solicitors | employment solicitors | wills and probate | personal injury solicitors | divorce solicitors | legal advice | solicitors St Leonards | solicitors Heavitree | conveyancing St Leonards | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dunn & Baker | 12 | 3 | 14 | 7 | 48 | 3 | 4 | 10 | 14 | 65 | ||
| Amicus Law | 7 | 8 | 6 | 8 | 15 | 22 | 9 | 7 | 5 | |||
| Gilbert Stephens | 9 | 19 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 9 | 6 | ||
| Stephens Scown | 17 | 15 | 33 | 39 | 8 | 16 | 39 | 52 | 39 | 8 | ||
| Wollens | 13 | 4 | 5 | 51 | 5 | 76 | 9 | 26 | 24 | 3 | ||
| Setfords Exeter | 25 | 21 | 22 | 59 | 65 | 44 | 44 | 28 | 49 | |||
| Porter Dodson | 5 | 9 | 7 | 48 | 19 | 10 | 27 | 19 | 12 | 2 | ||
| WBW Solicitors | 16 | 23 | 16 | 46 | 25 | 13 | 39 | 20 | 10 |
1–3 4–10 11–20 21+ absent
No firm in this index reaches the first page for “solicitors St Leonards”, “conveyancing St Leonards”. That is uncontested ground, and it is invisible in a league table.
Where each firm is visible
Section titled “Where each firm is visible”| Visible in | Firms | Which |
|---|---|---|
| All three channels | 4 | Dunn & Baker, Amicus Law, Gilbert Stephens, Stephens Scown |
| Organic + local pack | 0 | — |
| Organic + AI | 3 | Wollens, Porter Dodson, WBW Solicitors |
| Local pack + AI | 0 | — |
| Organic only | 0 | — |
| Local pack only | 0 | — |
| AI only | 1 | Setfords Exeter |
| None of the three | 0 | — |
4 of 8 firms are visible in all three channels.
Search visibility against AI presence
Section titled “Search visibility against AI presence”horizontal: search visibility → vertical: AI presence ↑
Amicus Law is the widest split: AI engines name it far more readily than search surfaces it (AI 100, visibility 46). Those are different problems behind a similar overall score.
Closest to the first page
Section titled “Closest to the first page”| Dunn & Baker | Dunn & Baker — solicitors Exeter | #12 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Porter Dodson | Porter Dodson — legal advice Exeter | #12 | |
| Wollens | Wollens — solicitors Exeter | #13 | |
| WBW Solicitors | WBW Solicitors — wills and probate Exeter | #13 | |
| Dunn & Baker | Dunn & Baker — conveyancing solicitors Exeter | #14 | |
| Dunn & Baker | Dunn & Baker — legal advice Exeter | #14 | |
| Amicus Law | Amicus Law — employment solicitors Exeter | #15 | |
| Stephens Scown | Stephens Scown — best solicitors Exeter | #15 | |
| Stephens Scown | Stephens Scown — wills and probate Exeter | #16 | |
| WBW Solicitors | WBW Solicitors — solicitors Exeter | #16 |
16 winnable positions across 7 firms sit between #11 and #20 — one page off, and closer than any keyword the index does not already measure.
Reputation: reviews against rating
Section titled “Reputation: reviews against rating”horizontal: reviews (log) → vertical: rating ↑
Review volume spans 1 to 209 and ratings 3.8 to 5, yet the Local pillar separates these firms by only 17 points — the raw figures discriminate where the score does not. Most reviews: Stephens Scown (209). Highest rating: Porter Dodson (5).
What the keyword basket is asking
Section titled “What the keyword basket is asking”| commercial | 11 of 12 | |
|---|---|---|
| navigational | 1 of 12 |
Local pack coverage across the city
Section titled “Local pack coverage across the city”| 1NWnorth-west, 50.773, -3.619 — Gilbert Stephens | 2Nnorth, 50.773, -3.534 — Dunn & Baker, Amicus Law | NEnorth-east, 50.773, -3.449 — no indexed firm in the pack here |
| 2Wwest, 50.718, -3.619 — Amicus Law, Dunn & Baker | 2·centre, 50.718, -3.534 — Stephens Scown, Dunn & Baker | Eeast, 50.718, -3.449 — no indexed firm in the pack here |
| 2SWsouth-west, 50.664, -3.619 — Amicus Law, Stephens Scown | Ssouth, 50.664, -3.534 — no indexed firm in the pack here | SEsouth-east, 50.664, -3.449 — no indexed firm in the pack here |
none 1 firm 2 3 of the pack
Which exeter solicitor has the best website?
Section titled “Which exeter solicitor has the best website?”Dunn & Baker tops the Q3-2026 index with a Digital Visibility Score of 77/100. Each firm has a full diagnostic scorecard linked from the table above.
How this is measured
Section titled “How this is measured”Every score follows the same six-pillar methodology: Speed & Core Web Vitals (20%), Technical foundation (20%), Local presence (20%), Visibility (15%), AI search presence (15%) and Content & trust (10%). Each pillar links to the knowledge-base article that explains what it measures; the statistical methods behind the scoring are written up separately. Download the full dataset: JSON · CSV.
Who publishes this
Section titled “Who publishes this”The index is compiled and published by PYC, a search consultancy run by Phil Yarrow. It exists because the questions it answers — who is actually visible in a local market, and by how much — were being answered with opinion. The collection and scoring code is open source, so any figure here can be recomputed rather than taken on trust.
Related reading on the practice behind the measurements: topical authority, generative engine optimisation, and case studies from comparable service businesses.
Using this data
Section titled “Using this data”This dataset is published under CC BY 4.0. You may reuse it, including commercially and in AI-generated answers, provided you credit Phil Yarrow (PYC) by name and link back. That credit is a condition of use, not a courtesy.
Phil Yarrow (PYC) — Local Digital Visibility Index. https://hub.pyc.agency/indices/
That one credit covers every dataset on this site — one figure or all of them. When quoting this particular dataset precisely, the fuller form is:
Phil Yarrow (PYC) — Local Digital Visibility Index: Exeter Solicitor, Q3-2026. https://hub.pyc.agency/indices/exeter-solicitors/
Full terms: licence and attribution.
Spotted an error? Request a correction.