Gloucester Construction Digital Visibility Index — Q3-2026
The PYC Gloucester Construction Digital Visibility Index ranks 13 gloucester constructions on how well they perform online — website speed, technical SEO, local presence, search visibility, AI search presence and content & trust — each scored 0–100 to a single Digital Visibility Score. Measured 27 August 2026 to the published methodology.
As of Q3-2026, 33% of the 12 gloucester constructions measured on Speed & Core Web Vitals score below 50 on mobile (PYC Gloucester Construction Digital Visibility Index, measured 27 August 2026).
Who owns the first page
Section titled “Who owns the first page”this index (11) directories, national chains and firms not indexed (109)
Ranking well but not currently indexed:
- checkatrade.com — 10 top-10 slots, best #1
- fmb.org.uk — 8 top-10 slots, best #1
- trustatrader.com — 7 top-10 slots, best #1
- irenovateltd.co.uk — 4 top-10 slots, best #1
- thornhomes.co.uk — 4 top-10 slots, best #3
90.8% of the first page belongs to businesses outside this index — directories, national chains and local firms not tracked here. These firms are not mainly competing with each other.
The league table
Section titled “The league table”| # | Gloucester Construction | Score | Spd | Tech | Local | Vis | AI | Cont |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Guardian Builders Gloucester | 58 | 73 | 75 | 63 | 42 | 40 | 33 |
| 2 | Builder Gloucestershire | 56 | 62 | 100 | 22 | 8 | 100 | 33 |
| 3 | Buildex Construction | 51 | 41 | 75 | 63 | 17 | 40 | 67 |
| 4 | RPM Building Services | 49 | 55 | 100 | 63 | 33 | 0 | 0 |
| 5 | Longlevens Building | 47 | 57 | 75 | 65 | 29 | 0 | 33 |
| 6 | AJ Build | 46 | 66 | 100 | — | 4 | 0 | 33 |
| 7 | Cotswold Construction | 46 | 62 | 50 | 50 | 29 | 60 | 0 |
| 8 | Halford Builders | 46 | 60 | 75 | 56 | 29 | 0 | 33 |
| 9 | Carma UK Construction | 44 | 32 | 100 | 68 | 4 | 0 | 33 |
| 10 | A.R.D. Developments | 43 | 48 | 63 | 65 | 33 | 0 | 33 |
| 11 | King Builders | 40 | 61 | 50 | 65 | 31 | 0 | 0 |
| 12 | L & W Building Contractors | 37 | 32 | 88 | — | 38 | 0 | 0 |
| 13 | Gloucester Builders | 32 | — | 0 | — | 25 | 80 | — |
Which keywords are contested, and which are open?
Section titled “Which keywords are contested, and which are open?”| builders | construction companies | best builders | house extensions | loft conversions | new build developers | commercial construction | groundworks contractors | renovation builders | builders Quedgeley | builders Hucclecote | construction Quedgeley | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guardian Builders Gloucester | 16 | 26 | 12 | 25 | 17 | 14 | 15 | 33 | 37 | 57 | ||
| Builder Gloucestershire | 29 | 44 | ||||||||||
| Buildex Construction | 59 | 54 | 7 | 21 | ||||||||
| RPM Building Services | 19 | 29 | 25 | 21 | 17 | 7 | 38 | 35 | ||||
| Longlevens Building | 3 | 42 | 3 | 8 | 32 | 22 | 32 | |||||
| AJ Build | 36 | |||||||||||
| Cotswold Construction | 51 | 68 | 34 | 55 | 23 | 36 | 60 | |||||
| Halford Builders | 14 | 47 | 39 | 27 | 11 | 10 | 29 | |||||
| Carma UK Construction | 65 | |||||||||||
| A.R.D. Developments | 27 | 50 | 30 | 28 | 62 | 53 | 25 | 68 | ||||
| King Builders | 6 | 1 | 11 | 13 | 47 | 16 | 26 | |||||
| L & W Building Contractors | 4 | 12 | 8 | 9 | 12 | 20 | 13 | 23 | 34 | |||
| Gloucester Builders | 43 | 40 | 33 | 26 | 40 | 15 |
1–3 4–10 11–20 21+ absent
No firm in this index reaches the first page for “loft conversions Gloucester”, “new build developers Gloucester”, “commercial construction Gloucester” and 3 other keywords. That is uncontested ground, and it is invisible in a league table.
Where each firm is visible
Section titled “Where each firm is visible”| Visible in | Firms | Which |
|---|---|---|
| All three channels | 0 | — |
| Organic + local pack | 1 | King Builders |
| Organic + AI | 1 | Buildex Construction |
| Local pack + AI | 0 | — |
| Organic only | 4 | RPM Building Services, Longlevens Building, Halford Builders, L & W Building Contractors |
| Local pack only | 0 | — |
| AI only | 4 | Guardian Builders Gloucester, Builder Gloucestershire, Cotswold Construction, Gloucester Builders |
| None of the three | 3 | AJ Build, Carma UK Construction, A.R.D. Developments |
Not one firm in this index is visible in all three channels at once.
Search visibility against AI presence
Section titled “Search visibility against AI presence”horizontal: search visibility → vertical: AI presence ↑
Builder Gloucestershire is the widest split: AI engines name it far more readily than search surfaces it (AI 100, visibility 8) — brand without search. Those are different problems behind a similar overall score.
Closest to the first page
Section titled “Closest to the first page”| Halford Builders | Halford Builders — loft conversions Gloucester | #11 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| King Builders | King Builders — best builders Gloucester | #11 | |
| Guardian Builders Gloucester | Guardian Builders Gloucester — best builders Gloucester | #12 | |
| L & W Building Contractors | L & W Building Contractors — construction companies Gloucester | #12 | |
| L & W Building Contractors | L & W Building Contractors — loft conversions Gloucester | #12 | |
| King Builders | King Builders — commercial construction Gloucester | #13 | |
| L & W Building Contractors | L & W Building Contractors — renovation builders Gloucester | #13 | |
| Guardian Builders Gloucester | Guardian Builders Gloucester — commercial construction Gloucester | #14 | |
| Halford Builders | Halford Builders — builders Gloucester | #14 | |
| Guardian Builders Gloucester | Guardian Builders Gloucester — renovation builders Gloucester | #15 |
17 winnable positions across 6 firms sit between #11 and #20 — one page off, and closer than any keyword the index does not already measure.
Reputation: reviews against rating
Section titled “Reputation: reviews against rating”horizontal: reviews (log) → vertical: rating ↑
Review volume spans 1 to 34 and ratings 3.8 to 5, yet the Local pillar separates these firms by only 18 points — the raw figures discriminate where the score does not. Most reviews: A.R.D. Developments (34). Highest rating: 6 firms tied at 5.
What the keyword basket is asking
Section titled “What the keyword basket is asking”| commercial | 10 of 12 | |
|---|---|---|
| navigational | 2 of 12 |
Local pack coverage across the city
Section titled “Local pack coverage across the city”| NWnorth-west, 51.918, -2.325 — no indexed firm in the pack here | Nnorth, 51.918, -2.238 — no indexed firm in the pack here | NEnorth-east, 51.918, -2.151 — no indexed firm in the pack here |
| 1Wwest, 51.864, -2.325 — Builder Gloucestershire | ·centre, 51.864, -2.238 — no indexed firm in the pack here | Eeast, 51.864, -2.151 — no indexed firm in the pack here |
| 1SWsouth-west, 51.810, -2.325 — Builder Gloucestershire | Ssouth, 51.810, -2.238 — no indexed firm in the pack here | SEsouth-east, 51.810, -2.151 — no indexed firm in the pack here |
none 1 firm 2 3 of the pack
Which gloucester construction has the best website?
Section titled “Which gloucester construction has the best website?”Guardian Builders Gloucester tops the Q3-2026 index with a Digital Visibility Score of 58/100. Each firm has a full diagnostic scorecard linked from the table above.
How this is measured
Section titled “How this is measured”Every score follows the same six-pillar methodology: Speed & Core Web Vitals (20%), Technical foundation (20%), Local presence (20%), Visibility (15%), AI search presence (15%) and Content & trust (10%). Each pillar links to the knowledge-base article that explains what it measures; the statistical methods behind the scoring are written up separately. Download the full dataset: JSON · CSV.
Who publishes this
Section titled “Who publishes this”The index is compiled and published by PYC, a search consultancy run by Phil Yarrow. It exists because the questions it answers — who is actually visible in a local market, and by how much — were being answered with opinion. The collection and scoring code is open source, so any figure here can be recomputed rather than taken on trust.
Related reading on the practice behind the measurements: topical authority, generative engine optimisation, and case studies from comparable service businesses.
Using this data
Section titled “Using this data”This dataset is published under CC BY 4.0. You may reuse it, including commercially and in AI-generated answers, provided you credit Phil Yarrow (PYC) by name and link back. That credit is a condition of use, not a courtesy.
Phil Yarrow (PYC) — Local Digital Visibility Index. https://hub.pyc.agency/indices/
That one credit covers every dataset on this site — one figure or all of them. When quoting this particular dataset precisely, the fuller form is:
Phil Yarrow (PYC) — Local Digital Visibility Index: Gloucester Construction, Q3-2026. https://hub.pyc.agency/indices/gloucester-construction/
Full terms: licence and attribution.
Spotted an error? Request a correction.