Measured 5 October 2026 via the PYC Gloucester Construction Digital Visibility Index. Every figure is objective and reproducible from the methodology. Spotted an error? Request a correction.
Build local landing pages for the core keyword basket to lift organic and local-pack appearance.
Restart Google review generation and complete the Business Profile to close the local-pack gap.
Introduce the people who do the work, on an about or team page and the credentials that matter in this sector (FMB, TrustMark, NHBC), and refresh stale content.
Recorded alongside the measurement to make it easier to judge, but carrying no weight in the Digital Visibility Score. See the methodology.
Companies House
No confident match on the registered name
Real-user speed (CrUX)
Too little traffic to appear in Chrome’s public dataset
Lighthouse (lab, mobile)
Performance 63 · accessibility 91 · best practices 100 · SEO 92 — biggest losses: Network dependency tree; `[aria-*]` attributes do not match their roles; Reduce unused JavaScript
6 pages crawled · 27 internal links per page · reachable in: contact 1 click, about 1 click, services 1 click · 0% of links use a generic anchor · 0 sitemap pages not reachable by following links
Sitemap
6 URLs listed · declared in robots.txt · newest entry 465 days old · 5 of 5 sampled URLs resolve
Builder Gloucestershire’s lowest-scoring pillars among those we publish remediation guidance for:
Visibility (0/100) — read topical authority on why ranking breadth across a sector beats chasing single terms. Background on analysing this pillar: visibility.
Local presence (33/100) — read local case studies on what moving these signals did for comparable service businesses. Background on analysing this pillar: local presence.