Skip to content

King Builders — Gloucester Construction Digital Visibility Score

Digital Visibility Score: 55 / 100 · Rank 5 of 13

Measured 5 October 2026 via the PYC Gloucester Construction Digital Visibility Index. Every figure is objective and reproducible from the methodology. Spotted an error? Request a correction.

Each pillar scored 0–100 against the sector median for this index. The final column is this firm's distance from that median.
PillarScoreMedianvs median
Speed & CWV6761+6
Technical100100level
Local presence8178+3
Visibility1413+1
AI search presence00level
Content & trust3737level
Pillar performance against the sector median. Bars right of centre are above the median, left are below.
Speed & CWV+6
Technical0
Local presence+3
Visibility+1
AI search presence0
Content & trust0
These are specific, checkable faults on the site — not opinions about it.
  • Worth knowingThe site has not changed in a long timeThe homepage last reported a change 4.4 years ago.
Ranks for 3 of 12 keywords, average position 13, in the local 3-pack for 1 keyword.
KeywordPosition
builders Gloucesternot in top 100
construction companies Gloucester#4
best builders Gloucester#1
house extensions Gloucesternot in top 100
loft conversions Gloucesternot in top 100
new build developers Gloucesternot in top 100
commercial construction Gloucesternot in top 100
groundworks contractors Gloucesternot in top 100
renovation builders Gloucester#34
builders Quedgeleynot in top 100
builders Hucclecotenot in top 100
construction Quedgeleynot in top 100
This firm against the sector median and the index leader, Builder Gloucestershire, on every pillar.
Speed & CWV67
Technical100
Local presence81
Visibility14
AI search presence0
Content & trust37

this firm sector median leader

The whole deficit to Builder Gloucestershire is AI search presence — 100 points. It already matches or beats the leader on Speed & CWV, Technical, Local presence, Visibility, Content & trust.

Named in 0 of 5 AI answers. A domain citation is stronger evidence than a name mention.
✗Who are the best builders in Gloucester?
✗Which construction company in Gloucester would you recommend for an extension?
✗Top rated building contractors in Gloucester
✗I need a builder in Gloucester - who should I contact?
✗Best construction firms in Quedgeley, Gloucester
Google Business Profile.
Rating3.9 / 5
Reviews7
Locations1
Reviews in last 90 days0
Address matches websiteyes
What each score is made of. Every input here is in the open dataset, so the arithmetic can be checked rather than taken on trust.
PillarScoreMade up of
Content & trust37about page: yes · people introduced: no · credentials: no · blog or news: no · homepage: 928 words · last changed: 1615 days ago
Visibility14ranks for 3 of 12 keywords · average position 13 · local 3-pack: 1
Local presence817 reviews · rated 3.9 · 0 new in 90 days
Technical100HTTPS: yes · page allows indexing: yes · robots.txt allows crawling: yes · sitemap: yes · structured data: yes
  • No pillar falls materially below the sector median this quarter.

Builder Gloucestershire leads the index with 57/100. The largest gaps are: AI search presence (0 vs 100).

  1. Publish structured, citable content and entity schema so AI engines surface the business for core local queries.
  2. Build local landing pages for the core keyword basket to lift organic and local-pack appearance.
  3. Introduce the people who do the work, on an about or team page and the credentials that matter in this sector (FMB, TrustMark, NHBC), and refresh stale content.
The firms nearest King Builders in this ranking, beyond the two either side.
FirmRankScoreWhy it is here
Carma UK Construction#355/1002 places above you
Gloucester Builders#752/1002 places below you
Buildex Construction#257/1003 places above you
RPM Building Services#851/1003 places below you
Recorded alongside the measurement to make it easier to judge, but carrying no weight in the Digital Visibility Score. See the methodology.
Companies HouseNo confident match on the registered name
Real-user speed (CrUX)Too little traffic to appear in Chrome’s public dataset
Lighthouse (lab, mobile)Performance 85 · accessibility 77 · best practices 100 · SEO 100 — biggest losses: Touch targets do not have sufficient size or spacing.; Links do not have a discernible name; Buttons do not have an accessible name
Google profile detail24 photos · claimed · has a description · hours listed · 2 of 7 reviews are one star
Backlinks64 referring domains · 76 links · rank 78
Site structureNot crawled — homepage HTTP 403

King Builders’s lowest-scoring pillars among those we publish remediation guidance for:


How this is measured: see the index methodology, and the statistical methods behind each pillar. This index is published by PYC; if you want this score moved, start here.