King Builders — Gloucester Construction Digital Visibility Score
King Builders — PYC Gloucester Construction Digital Visibility Index, Q3-2026
Digital Visibility Score: 40 / 100 · Rank 11 of 13
Measured 27 August 2026 via the PYC Gloucester Construction Digital Visibility Index. Every figure is objective and reproducible from the methodology. Spotted an error? Request a correction.
Pillar breakdown vs sector median
Section titled “Pillar breakdown vs sector median”| Pillar | Score | Median | vs median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Speed & CWV | 61 | 58.5 | +2.5 |
| Technical | 50 | 75 | −25 |
| Local presence | 65 | 63 | +2 |
| Visibility | 31 | 29 | +2 |
| AI search presence | 0 | 0 | level |
| Content & trust | 0 | 33 | −33 |
| Speed & CWV | +2.5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Technical | -25 | |
| Local presence | +2 | |
| Visibility | +2 | |
| AI search presence | 0 | |
| Content & trust | -33 |
Where this firm ranks
Section titled “Where this firm ranks”| Keyword | Position |
|---|---|
| builders Gloucester | #6 |
| construction companies Gloucester | #1 |
| best builders Gloucester | #11 |
| house extensions Gloucester | not in top 100 |
| loft conversions Gloucester | not in top 100 |
| new build developers Gloucester | not in top 100 |
| commercial construction Gloucester | #13 |
| groundworks contractors Gloucester | #47 |
| renovation builders Gloucester | not in top 100 |
| builders Quedgeley | #16 |
| builders Hucclecote | not in top 100 |
| construction Quedgeley | #26 |
The gap to the leader
Section titled “The gap to the leader”| Speed & CWV | 61 | |
|---|---|---|
| Technical | 50 | |
| Local presence | 65 | |
| Visibility | 31 | |
| AI search presence | 0 | |
| Content & trust | 0 |
this firm sector median leader
King Builders trails Guardian Builders Gloucester by 121 points across 5 pillars, but 60% of that is AI search presence and Content & trust alone. It already matches or beats the leader on Local presence.
Closest to the first page
Section titled “Closest to the first page”| best builders Gloucester | #11 | |
| commercial construction Gloucester | #13 | |
| builders Quedgeley | #16 |
3 positions sit between #11 and #20 — one page away, and the cheapest ranking work available to this firm.
AI search presence
Section titled “AI search presence”| ✗ | Who are the best builders in Gloucester? | |
| ✗ | Which construction company in Gloucester would you recommend for an extension? | |
| ✗ | Top rated building contractors in Gloucester | |
| ✗ | I need a builder in Gloucester - who should I contact? | |
| ✗ | Best construction firms in Quedgeley, Gloucester |
Local presence
Section titled “Local presence”| Rating | 3.9 / 5 |
|---|---|
| Reviews | 7 |
| Locations | 1 |
| Reviews in last 90 days | 0 |
| Address matches website | yes |
Key findings
Section titled “Key findings”- Technical: 50/100, below the sector median of 75.
- Content & trust: 0/100, below the sector median of 33.
How this compares to the leader
Section titled “How this compares to the leader”Guardian Builders Gloucester leads the index with 58/100. The largest gaps are: AI search presence (0 vs 40); Content & trust (0 vs 33); Technical (50 vs 75).
Top fixes (ranked by impact)
Section titled “Top fixes (ranked by impact)”- Publish structured, citable content and entity schema so AI engines surface the business for core local queries.
- Add about/team pages and the credentials that matter in this sector (FMB, TrustMark, NHBC), and refresh stale content.
- Build local landing pages for the core keyword basket to lift organic and local-pack appearance.
Where to get this fixed
Section titled “Where to get this fixed”King Builders’s lowest-scoring pillars among those we publish remediation guidance for:
- AI search presence (0/100) — read generative engine optimisation on getting named by the answer engines this pillar measures. Background on analysing this pillar: ai search presence.
- Content & trust (0/100) — read topical authority on how depth and coverage compound into citation-worthiness. Background on analysing this pillar: content & trust.
How this is measured: see the index methodology, and the statistical methods behind each pillar. This index is published by PYC; if you want this score moved, start here.