Skip to content

Stephens Scown — Exeter Solicitor Digital Visibility Score

Digital Visibility Score: 66 / 100 · Rank 5 of 8

Measured 3 October 2026 via the PYC Exeter Solicitor Digital Visibility Index. Every figure is objective and reproducible from the methodology. Spotted an error? Request a correction.

Each pillar scored 0–100 against the sector median for this index. The final column is this firm's distance from that median.
PillarScoreMedianvs median
Speed & CWV5566.5−11.5
Technical100100level
Local presence9879.5+18.5
Visibility2523+2
AI search presence2020level
Content & trust8778.5+8.5
Pillar performance against the sector median. Bars right of centre are above the median, left are below.
Speed & CWV-11.5
Technical0
Local presence+18.5
Visibility+2
AI search presence0
Content & trust+8.5
These are specific, checkable faults on the site — not opinions about it.
  • Worth knowingThe site has not changed in a long timeThe homepage last reported a change 11.3 years ago.
Ranks for 4 of 12 keywords, average position 19.8, in the local 3-pack for 5 keywords.
KeywordPosition
solicitors Exeternot in top 100
best solicitors Exeternot in top 100
conveyancing solicitors Exeternot in top 100
family law solicitors Exeter#1
employment solicitors Exeternot in top 100
wills and probate Exeter#25
personal injury solicitors Exeter#42
divorce solicitors Exeter#11
legal advice Exeternot in top 100
solicitors St Leonardsnot in top 100
solicitors Heavitreenot in top 100
conveyancing St Leonardsnot in top 100
This firm against the sector median and the index leader, Gilbert Stephens, on every pillar.
Speed & CWV55
Technical100
Local presence98
Visibility25
AI search presence20
Content & trust87

this firm sector median leader

Stephens Scown trails Gilbert Stephens by 87 points across 3 pillars, but 74% of that is AI search presence and Visibility alone. It already matches or beats the leader on Technical, Local presence, Content & trust.

Ranked between #11 and #20 — one page from the first, ordered by how close.
divorce solicitors Exeter#11

1 position sits between #11 and #20 — one page away, and the cheapest ranking work available to this firm.

Named in 1 of 5 AI answers. A domain citation is stronger evidence than a name mention.
✗Who are the best solicitors in Exeter?
✗Which law firm in Exeter would you recommend for conveyancing?
✓Top rated family law solicitors in Exetercited by domain
✗I need a solicitor in Exeter - who should I contact?
✗Best solicitors in St Leonards, Exeter
Google Business Profile.
Rating4.6 / 5
Reviews214
Locations1
Reviews in last 90 days8
Address matches websiteyes
Largest Contentful Paint measured two ways: one throttled lab run, against 28 days of real Chrome users.
Lab (Lighthouse, mobile)25.3sone throttled load on a datacentre machine
Field (real users)1.9s75th percentile of actual Chrome visitors over 28 days

The lab figure is 13.4× the real-user figure. The lab test rates this site poorly, but real visitors are not experiencing it that way — Core Web Vitals pass on field data. Treat a low lab score here as a lead to investigate, not a fault to pay to fix.

Themes Google extracted from this business’s reviews, by how often customers raise them. Not scored — this is what people say, not how findable the business is.
  • professional team58
  • responsiveness22
  • visa application12
  • divorce litigation8
  • employment litigation5
  • immigration team5
  • matrimonial proceedings3
  • spouse visa application2
  • family law department2
  • timely application submission2
What each score is made of. Every input here is in the open dataset, so the arithmetic can be checked rather than taken on trust.
PillarScoreMade up of
Content & trust87about page: yes · people introduced: yes · credentials: yes · blog or news: yes · homepage: 1,113 words · last changed: 4131 days ago
Visibility25ranks for 4 of 12 keywords · average position 19.8 · local 3-pack: 5
Local presence98214 reviews · rated 4.6 · 8 new in 90 days
Technical100HTTPS: yes · page allows indexing: yes · robots.txt allows crawling: yes · sitemap: yes · structured data: yes
  • Speed & CWV: 55/100, below the sector median of 66.5.

Gilbert Stephens leads the index with 76/100. The largest gaps are: AI search presence (20 vs 60); Visibility (25 vs 49); Speed & CWV (55 vs 78).

  1. Publish structured, citable content and entity schema so AI engines surface the business for core local queries.
  2. Build local landing pages for the core keyword basket to lift organic and local-pack appearance.
  3. Cut mobile LCP below 2.5s (optimise images and remove render-blocking resources) — the biggest score and ranking lever.
The firms nearest Stephens Scown in this ranking, beyond the two either side.
FirmRankScoreWhy it is here
Amicus Law#370/1002 places above you
Porter Dodson#758/1002 places below you
Wollens#272/1003 places above you
WBW Solicitors#858/1003 places below you
Recorded alongside the measurement to make it easier to judge, but carrying no weight in the Digital Visibility Score. See the methodology.
Companies HouseCompany OC356696 · 16.2 years old · active
Real-user speed (CrUX)LCP 1880ms · INP 80ms · CLS 0 · passes Core Web Vitals
Lighthouse (lab, mobile)Performance 41 · accessibility 84 · best practices 96 · SEO 85 — biggest losses: Reduce JavaScript execution time; Browser errors were logged to the console; Links do not have descriptive text
Google profile detail58 photos · claimed · has a description · hours listed · 18 of 214 reviews are one star
Backlinks729 referring domains · 24118 links · rank 339 · 9727 broken
Site structure25 pages crawled · 199.6 internal links per page · reachable in: contact 1 click, about 1 click, team 2 clicks · 1% of links use a generic anchor
Sitemap1001 URLs listed · declared in robots.txt · newest entry 2 days old · 5 of 5 sampled URLs resolve

Stephens Scown’s lowest-scoring pillars among those we publish remediation guidance for:


How this is measured: see the index methodology, and the statistical methods behind each pillar. This index is published by PYC; if you want this score moved, start here.