Measured 3 October 2026 via the PYC Cheltenham Law Firm Digital Visibility Index. Every figure is objective and reproducible from the methodology. Spotted an error? Request a correction.
These are specific, checkable faults on the site — not opinions about it.
Worth fixingNo XML sitemap foundSearch engines have to discover every page by following links. On a small site that is survivable; on a large one it is not.
Worth knowingThe site has not changed in a long timeThe homepage last reported a change 9 years ago.
This firm against the sector median and the index leader, HCR Law, on every pillar.
Speed & CWV
89
Technical
88
Visibility
4
AI search presence
0
Content & trust
70
this firm sector median leader
Setfords Cheltenham trails HCR Law by 97 points across 4 pillars, but 70% of that is AI search presence and Visibility alone. It already matches or beats the leader on Speed & CWV.
Largest Contentful Paint measured two ways: one throttled lab run, against 28 days of real Chrome users.
Lab (Lighthouse, mobile)
3.0s
one throttled load on a datacentre machine
Field (real users)
2.7s
75th percentile of actual Chrome visitors over 28 days
The lab figure is 1.1× the real-user figure. The lab test looks acceptable while real visitors are failing Core Web Vitals. This is the more serious direction of disagreement: the problem is real and a one-off lab run is missing it. The metric failing for real users is loading (LCP).
Publish structured, citable content and entity schema so AI engines surface the business for core local queries.
Build local landing pages for the core keyword basket to lift organic and local-pack appearance.
Introduce the people who do the work, on an about or team page and the credentials that matter in this sector (SRA, Law Society), and refresh stale content.
Recorded alongside the measurement to make it easier to judge, but carrying no weight in the Digital Visibility Score. See the methodology.
Companies House
No confident match on the registered name
Real-user speed (CrUX)
LCP 2719ms · INP 104ms · CLS 0 · does not pass Core Web Vitals
Lighthouse (lab, mobile)
Performance 88 · accessibility 85 · best practices 96 · SEO 92 — biggest losses: Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.; Touch targets do not have sufficient size or spacing.; Lists do not contain only `<li>` elements and script supporting elements (`<script>` and `<template>`).
Visibility (4/100) — read topical authority on why ranking breadth across a sector beats chasing single terms. Background on analysing this pillar: visibility.