Measured 29 August 2026 via the PYC Worcester Construction Digital Visibility Index. Every figure is objective and reproducible from the methodology. Spotted an error? Request a correction.
These are specific, checkable faults on the site — not opinions about it.
Worth fixingNo structured data on the homepageNothing tells a search engine or an assistant what this business is, where it is, or what it does — in machine-readable terms.
Worth fixingVery little published contentThe homepage carries 329 words and the site links to no blog, news or insights section. There is little here for a search engine to match, or for an assistant to quote.
This firm against the sector median and the index leader, General Builds, on every pillar.
Speed & CWV
87
Technical
75
Local presence
78
Visibility
0
AI search presence
0
Content & trust
10
this firm sector median leader
Crush And Save trails General Builds by 137 points across 5 pillars, but 58% of that is Content & trust and Visibility alone. It already matches or beats the leader on Speed & CWV.
Recorded alongside the measurement to make it easier to judge, but carrying no weight in the Digital Visibility Score. See the methodology.
Companies House
No confident match on the registered name
Real-user speed (CrUX)
Too little traffic to appear in Chrome’s public dataset
Lighthouse (lab, mobile)
Performance 74 · accessibility 77 · best practices 37 · SEO 92 — biggest losses: Links rely on color to be distinguishable.; `<frame>` or `<iframe>` elements do not have a title; LCP request discovery
Google profile detail
2 photos · unclaimed · no description · hours listed
Backlinks
21 referring domains · 22 links · rank 0
Site structure
1 pages crawled · 1 internal links per page · 0% of links use a generic anchor
Crush And Save’s lowest-scoring pillars among those we publish remediation guidance for:
Visibility (0/100) — read topical authority on why ranking breadth across a sector beats chasing single terms. Background on analysing this pillar: visibility.