Skip to content

Crush And Save — Worcester Construction Digital Visibility Score

Digital Visibility Score: 49 / 100 · Rank 21 of 55

Measured 29 August 2026 via the PYC Worcester Construction Digital Visibility Index. Every figure is objective and reproducible from the methodology. Spotted an error? Request a correction.

Each pillar scored 0–100 against the sector median for this index. The final column is this firm's distance from that median.
PillarScoreMedianvs median
Speed & CWV8761+26
Technical7575level
Local presence7876+2
Visibility00level
AI search presence00level
Content & trust1037−27
Pillar performance against the sector median. Bars right of centre are above the median, left are below.
Speed & CWV+26
Technical0
Local presence+2
Visibility0
AI search presence0
Content & trust-27
These are specific, checkable faults on the site — not opinions about it.
  • Worth fixingNo structured data on the homepageNothing tells a search engine or an assistant what this business is, where it is, or what it does — in machine-readable terms.
  • Worth fixingVery little published contentThe homepage carries 329 words and the site links to no blog, news or insights section. There is little here for a search engine to match, or for an assistant to quote.
Ranks for 0 of 12 keywords, in the local 3-pack for 0 keywords.
KeywordPosition
builders Worcesternot in top 100
construction companies Worcesternot in top 100
best builders Worcesternot in top 100
house extensions Worcesternot in top 100
loft conversions Worcesternot in top 100
new build developers Worcesternot in top 100
commercial construction Worcesternot in top 100
groundworks contractors Worcesternot in top 100
renovation builders Worcesternot in top 100
builders St John'snot in top 100
builders Barbournenot in top 100
construction St John'snot in top 100
This firm against the sector median and the index leader, General Builds, on every pillar.
Speed & CWV87
Technical75
Local presence78
Visibility0
AI search presence0
Content & trust10

this firm sector median leader

Crush And Save trails General Builds by 137 points across 5 pillars, but 58% of that is Content & trust and Visibility alone. It already matches or beats the leader on Speed & CWV.

Named in 0 of 5 AI answers. A domain citation is stronger evidence than a name mention.
Who are the best builders in Worcester?
Which construction company in Worcester would you recommend for an extension?
Top rated building contractors in Worcester
I need a builder in Worcester - who should I contact?
Best construction firms in St John's, Worcester
Google Business Profile.
Rating5 / 5
Reviews4
Locations1
Reviews in last 90 days0
Address matches websiteyes
What each score is made of. Every input here is in the open dataset, so the arithmetic can be checked rather than taken on trust.
PillarScoreMade up of
Content & trust10about page: no · team page: no · credentials: no · blog or news: no · homepage: 329 words
Visibility0ranks for 0 of 12 keywords · local 3-pack: 0
Local presence784 reviews · rated 5 · 0 new in 90 days
Technical75HTTPS: yes · page allows indexing: yes · robots.txt allows crawling: yes · sitemap: yes · structured data: no
  • Content & trust: 10/100, below the sector median of 37.

General Builds leads the index with 66/100. The largest gaps are: Content & trust (10 vs 58); Visibility (0 vs 32); Technical (75 vs 100).

  1. Build local landing pages for the core keyword basket to lift organic and local-pack appearance.
  2. Publish structured, citable content and entity schema so AI engines surface the business for core local queries.
  3. Add about/team pages and the credentials that matter in this sector (FMB, TrustMark, NHBC), and refresh stale content.
The firms nearest Crush And Save in this ranking, beyond the two either side.
FirmRankScoreWhy it is here
H & B Refurbishments Ltd#1950/1002 places above you
Emzical Entertainment#2349/1002 places below you
Andy Johnson - Chimney Sweep & Stove Installer - Worcestershire#1850/1003 places above you
Property Development Services#2449/1003 places below you
Recorded alongside the measurement to make it easier to judge, but carrying no weight in the Digital Visibility Score. See the methodology.
Companies HouseNo confident match on the registered name
Real-user speed (CrUX)Too little traffic to appear in Chrome’s public dataset
Lighthouse (lab, mobile)Performance 74 · accessibility 77 · best practices 37 · SEO 92 — biggest losses: Links rely on color to be distinguishable.; `<frame>` or `<iframe>` elements do not have a title; LCP request discovery
Google profile detail2 photos · unclaimed · no description · hours listed
Backlinks21 referring domains · 22 links · rank 0
Site structure1 pages crawled · 1 internal links per page · 0% of links use a generic anchor

Crush And Save’s lowest-scoring pillars among those we publish remediation guidance for:


How this is measured: see the index methodology, and the statistical methods behind each pillar. This index is published by PYC; if you want this score moved, start here.