Measured 29 August 2026 via the PYC Gloucester Restaurant Digital Visibility Index. Every figure is objective and reproducible from the methodology. Spotted an error? Request a correction.
This firm against the sector median and the index leader, Greek on the Docks, on every pillar.
Speed & CWV
59
Technical
100
Local presence
66
Visibility
0
AI search presence
0
Content & trust
16
this firm sector median leader
Tara trails Greek on the Docks by 140 points across 5 pillars, but 66% of that is AI search presence and Local presence alone. It already matches or beats the leader on Technical.
Largest Contentful Paint measured two ways: one throttled lab run, against 28 days of real Chrome users.
Lab (Lighthouse, mobile)
22.8s
one throttled load on a datacentre machine
Field (real users)
1.6s
75th percentile of actual Chrome visitors over 28 days
The lab figure is 14.6× the real-user figure. The lab test rates this site poorly, but real visitors are not experiencing it that way — Core Web Vitals pass on field data. Treat a low lab score here as a lead to investigate, not a fault to pay to fix.
Themes Google extracted from this business’s reviews, by how often customers raise them. Not scored — this is what people say, not how findable the business is.
Performance 34 · accessibility 76 · best practices 92 · SEO 100 — biggest losses: Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order; Time to Interactive; Network dependency tree
Google profile detail
49 photos · unclaimed · no description · hours listed · 1 of 18 reviews are one star
Tara’s lowest-scoring pillars among those we publish remediation guidance for:
Visibility (0/100) — read topical authority on why ranking breadth across a sector beats chasing single terms. Background on analysing this pillar: visibility.