Measured 29 August 2026 via the PYC Gloucester Restaurant Digital Visibility Index. Every figure is objective and reproducible from the methodology. Spotted an error? Request a correction.
1 critical problem found. These are specific, checkable faults on the site — not opinions about it.
CriticalSearch engines are being told not to index this siteThe site’s own robots.txt disallows crawling. Until that changes, nothing else on this page can help — the pages cannot enter the index in the first place.
Worth fixingNo structured data on the homepageNothing tells a search engine or an assistant what this business is, where it is, or what it does — in machine-readable terms.
Themes Google extracted from this business’s reviews, by how often customers raise them. Not scored — this is what people say, not how findable the business is.
Recorded alongside the measurement to make it easier to judge, but carrying no weight in the Digital Visibility Score. See the methodology.
Companies House
No confident match on the registered name
Real-user speed (CrUX)
Too little traffic to appear in Chrome’s public dataset
Food hygiene (FSA)
No confident match on the registered trading name
Lighthouse (lab, mobile)
Performance 66 · accessibility 89 · best practices 74 · SEO 92 — biggest losses: Reduce unused CSS; Font display; Document request latency
Google profile detail
72 photos · claimed · has a description · hours listed · 15 of 363 reviews are one star
Backlinks
55 referring domains · 82 links · rank 149
Site structure
1 pages crawled · 46 internal links per page · reachable in: contact 1 click · 0% of links use a generic anchor · 5 sitemap pages not reachable by following links
Friar Tucks’s lowest-scoring pillars among those we publish remediation guidance for:
Visibility (0/100) — read topical authority on why ranking breadth across a sector beats chasing single terms. Background on analysing this pillar: visibility.