Skip to content

Olympian Bites — Gloucester Restaurant Digital Visibility Score

Digital Visibility Score: 39 / 100 · Rank 40 of 44

Measured 29 August 2026 via the PYC Gloucester Restaurant Digital Visibility Index. Every figure is objective and reproducible from the methodology. Spotted an error? Request a correction.

Each pillar scored 0–100 against the sector median for this index. The final column is this firm's distance from that median.
PillarScoreMedianvs median
Speed & CWV10069+31
Technical075−75
Local presence7584−9
Visibility00level
AI search presence00level
Content & trust26.5not measured
Pillar performance against the sector median. Bars right of centre are above the median, left are below.
Speed & CWV+31
Technical-75
Local presence-9
Visibility0
AI search presence0
Content & trustnot measured
1 critical problem found. These are specific, checkable faults on the site — not opinions about it.
  • CriticalThe site is not served over HTTPSBrowsers mark it as not secure, and it is a ranking signal in its own right.
  • Worth fixingNo XML sitemap foundSearch engines have to discover every page by following links. On a small site that is survivable; on a large one it is not.
Ranks for 0 of 12 keywords, in the local 3-pack for 0 keywords.
KeywordPosition
restaurants Gloucesternot in top 100
best restaurants Gloucesternot in top 100
places to eat Gloucesternot in top 100
restaurants near me Gloucesternot in top 100
fine dining Gloucesternot in top 100
family restaurants Gloucesternot in top 100
sunday lunch Gloucesternot in top 100
book a table Gloucesternot in top 100
top rated restaurants Gloucesternot in top 100
restaurants Gloucester Quaysnot in top 100
restaurants Westgatenot in top 100
places to eat Gloucester Quaysnot in top 100
This firm against the sector median and the index leader, Greek on the Docks, on every pillar.
Speed & CWV100
Technical0
Local presence75
Visibility0
AI search presence0

this firm sector median leader

Olympian Bites trails Greek on the Docks by 187 points across 4 pillars, but 79% of that is Technical and AI search presence alone. It already matches or beats the leader on Speed & CWV.

Named in 0 of 5 AI answers. A domain citation is stronger evidence than a name mention.
What are the best restaurants in Gloucester?
Where should I eat in Gloucester tonight?
Top rated restaurants in Gloucester
I want a nice meal in Gloucester - where should I book?
Best places to eat in Gloucester Quays, Gloucester
Google Business Profile.
Rating4.1 / 5
Reviews66
Locations1
Reviews in last 90 days0
Address matches websiteyes
Themes Google extracted from this business’s reviews, by how often customers raise them. Not scored — this is what people say, not how findable the business is.
  • fish10
  • price9
  • gyros7
  • starters4
  • lamb chops3
  • parsley3
  • phone numbers2
  • stuffed squid2
  • businesses2
  • delivery2
What each score is made of. Every input here is in the open dataset, so the arithmetic can be checked rather than taken on trust.
PillarScoreMade up of
Visibility0ranks for 0 of 12 keywords · local 3-pack: 0
Local presence7566 reviews · rated 4.1 · 0 new in 90 days
Technical0HTTPS: no · page allows indexing: — · robots.txt allows crawling: — · sitemap: no · structured data: —
  • Technical: 0/100, below the sector median of 75.

Greek on the Docks leads the index with 67/100. The largest gaps are: Technical (0 vs 88); AI search presence (0 vs 60); Local presence (75 vs 99).

  1. Add valid LocalBusiness schema, fix indexability, and ensure a fresh XML sitemap is referenced in robots.txt.
  2. Build local landing pages for the core keyword basket to lift organic and local-pack appearance.
  3. Publish structured, citable content and entity schema so AI engines surface the business for core local queries.
The firms nearest Olympian Bites in this ranking, beyond the two either side.
FirmRankScoreWhy it is here
Coney Hill Fish & Chips#3842/1002 places above you
Tim Hortons - Gloucester#4227/1002 places below you
The Victoria Hotel#3744/1003 places above you
Dough from dough (events only)#4322/1003 places below you
Recorded alongside the measurement to make it easier to judge, but carrying no weight in the Digital Visibility Score. See the methodology.
Companies HouseNo confident match on the registered name
Real-user speed (CrUX)Too little traffic to appear in Chrome’s public dataset
Lighthouse (lab, mobile)Performance 100 · accessibility 96 · best practices 74 · SEO 40 — biggest losses: Browser errors were logged to the console; Page is blocked from indexing; Document does not have a meta description
Google profile detail53 photos · claimed · has a description · no hours listed · 9 of 66 reviews are one star
Backlinks40 referring domains · 43 links · rank 96 · 53 broken
Site structureNot crawled — homepage HTTP 403

Olympian Bites’s lowest-scoring pillars among those we publish remediation guidance for:

  • Technical (0/100) — read SEO automation on running these technical checks continuously rather than once a quarter. Background on analysing this pillar: technical.
  • Visibility (0/100) — read topical authority on why ranking breadth across a sector beats chasing single terms. Background on analysing this pillar: visibility.

How this is measured: see the index methodology, and the statistical methods behind each pillar. This index is published by PYC; if you want this score moved, start here.