Measured 29 August 2026 via the PYC Gloucester Restaurant Digital Visibility Index. Every figure is objective and reproducible from the methodology. Spotted an error? Request a correction.
These are specific, checkable faults on the site — not opinions about it.
Worth fixingNo structured data on the homepageNothing tells a search engine or an assistant what this business is, where it is, or what it does — in machine-readable terms.
Worth fixingVery little published contentThe homepage carries 235 words and the site links to no blog, news or insights section. There is little here for a search engine to match, or for an assistant to quote.
Largest Contentful Paint measured two ways: one throttled lab run, against 28 days of real Chrome users.
Lab (Lighthouse, mobile)
10.7s
one throttled load on a datacentre machine
Field (real users)
1.7s
75th percentile of actual Chrome visitors over 28 days
The lab figure is 6.4× the real-user figure. The lab test looks acceptable while real visitors are failing Core Web Vitals. This is the more serious direction of disagreement: the problem is real and a one-off lab run is missing it. The metric failing for real users is responsiveness (INP).
Themes Google extracted from this business’s reviews, by how often customers raise them. Not scored — this is what people say, not how findable the business is.
Greek on the Docks leads the index with 67/100. The largest gaps are: AI search presence (20 vs 60); Local presence (78 vs 99); Content & trust (10 vs 28).
Côte Gloucester’s lowest-scoring pillars among those we publish remediation guidance for:
Visibility (0/100) and Content & trust (10/100) — read topical authority on why ranking breadth across a sector beats chasing single terms. Background on analysing these pillars: visibility, content & trust.