Skip to content

Côte Gloucester — Gloucester Restaurant Digital Visibility Score

Digital Visibility Score: 48 / 100 · Rank 25 of 44

Measured 29 August 2026 via the PYC Gloucester Restaurant Digital Visibility Index. Every figure is objective and reproducible from the methodology. Spotted an error? Request a correction.

Each pillar scored 0–100 against the sector median for this index. The final column is this firm's distance from that median.
PillarScoreMedianvs median
Speed & CWV6869−1
Technical7575level
Local presence7884−6
Visibility00level
AI search presence200+20
Content & trust1026.5−16.5
Pillar performance against the sector median. Bars right of centre are above the median, left are below.
Speed & CWV-1
Technical0
Local presence-6
Visibility0
AI search presence+20
Content & trust-16.5
These are specific, checkable faults on the site — not opinions about it.
  • Worth fixingNo structured data on the homepageNothing tells a search engine or an assistant what this business is, where it is, or what it does — in machine-readable terms.
  • Worth fixingVery little published contentThe homepage carries 235 words and the site links to no blog, news or insights section. There is little here for a search engine to match, or for an assistant to quote.
Ranks for 0 of 12 keywords, in the local 3-pack for 0 keywords.
KeywordPosition
restaurants Gloucesternot in top 100
best restaurants Gloucesternot in top 100
places to eat Gloucesternot in top 100
restaurants near me Gloucesternot in top 100
fine dining Gloucesternot in top 100
family restaurants Gloucesternot in top 100
sunday lunch Gloucesternot in top 100
book a table Gloucesternot in top 100
top rated restaurants Gloucesternot in top 100
restaurants Gloucester Quaysnot in top 100
restaurants Westgatenot in top 100
places to eat Gloucester Quaysnot in top 100
This firm against the sector median and the index leader, Greek on the Docks, on every pillar.
Speed & CWV68
Technical75
Local presence78
Visibility0
AI search presence20
Content & trust10

this firm sector median leader

Côte Gloucester trails Greek on the Docks by 118 points across 6 pillars, but 52% of that is AI search presence and Local presence alone.

Named in 1 of 5 AI answers. A domain citation is stronger evidence than a name mention.
What are the best restaurants in Gloucester?named
Where should I eat in Gloucester tonight?
Top rated restaurants in Gloucester
I want a nice meal in Gloucester - where should I book?
Best places to eat in Gloucester Quays, Gloucester
Google Business Profile.
Rating4.5 / 5
Reviews955
Locations1
Reviews in last 90 days0
Address matches websiteyes
Largest Contentful Paint measured two ways: one throttled lab run, against 28 days of real Chrome users.
Lab (Lighthouse, mobile)10.7sone throttled load on a datacentre machine
Field (real users)1.7s75th percentile of actual Chrome visitors over 28 days

The lab figure is 6.4× the real-user figure. The lab test looks acceptable while real visitors are failing Core Web Vitals. This is the more serious direction of disagreement: the problem is real and a one-off lab run is missing it. The metric failing for real users is responsiveness (INP).

Themes Google extracted from this business’s reviews, by how often customers raise them. Not scored — this is what people say, not how findable the business is.
  • french64
  • steak49
  • birthday33
  • mussels19
  • course15
  • champagne10
  • gloucester quays9
  • set menu7
  • food and wine6
  • fixed price5
What each score is made of. Every input here is in the open dataset, so the arithmetic can be checked rather than taken on trust.
PillarScoreMade up of
Content & trust10about page: no · team page: no · credentials: no · blog or news: no · homepage: 235 words
Visibility0ranks for 0 of 12 keywords · local 3-pack: 0
Local presence78955 reviews · rated 4.5 · 0 new in 90 days
Technical75HTTPS: yes · page allows indexing: yes · robots.txt allows crawling: yes · sitemap: yes · structured data: no
  • Content & trust: 10/100, below the sector median of 26.5.

Greek on the Docks leads the index with 67/100. The largest gaps are: AI search presence (20 vs 60); Local presence (78 vs 99); Content & trust (10 vs 28).

  1. Build local landing pages for the core keyword basket to lift organic and local-pack appearance.
  2. Add about/team pages, and refresh stale content.
  3. Publish structured, citable content and entity schema so AI engines surface the business for core local queries.
The firms nearest Côte Gloucester in this ranking, beyond the two either side.
FirmRankScoreWhy it is here
The Old Elm Inn#2350/1002 places above you
Banchina Italian#2747/1002 places below you
Fly Wingz#2250/1003 places above you
Golden City#2847/1003 places below you
Recorded alongside the measurement to make it easier to judge, but carrying no weight in the Digital Visibility Score. See the methodology.
Companies HouseNo confident match on the registered name
Real-user speed (CrUX)LCP 1673ms · INP 261ms · CLS 0.09 · does not pass Core Web Vitals
Food hygiene (FSA)No confident match on the registered trading name
Lighthouse (lab, mobile)Performance 57 · accessibility 96 · best practices 92 · SEO 100 — biggest losses: Avoid multiple page redirects; LCP breakdown; Network dependency tree
Google profile detail477 photos · claimed · has a description · no hours listed · 19 of 955 reviews are one star
Backlinks1734 referring domains · 35783 links · rank 334 · 10 broken
Site structure25 pages crawled · 19.8 internal links per page · reachable in: contact 1 click, services 1 click · 3% of links use a generic anchor
Sitemap333 URLs listed

Côte Gloucester’s lowest-scoring pillars among those we publish remediation guidance for:

  • Visibility (0/100) and Content & trust (10/100) — read topical authority on why ranking breadth across a sector beats chasing single terms. Background on analysing these pillars: visibility, content & trust.

How this is measured: see the index methodology, and the statistical methods behind each pillar. This index is published by PYC; if you want this score moved, start here.