Measured 1 September 2026 via the PYC Exeter Architect Digital Visibility Index. Every figure is objective and reproducible from the methodology. Spotted an error? Request a correction.
This firm against the sector median and the index leader, Living Space Architects, on every pillar.
Speed & CWV
81
Technical
100
Local presence
92
Visibility
60
AI search presence
80
Content & trust
53
this firm sector median leader
The whole deficit to Living Space Architects is AI search presence — 20 points. It already matches or beats the leader on Speed & CWV, Technical, Local presence, Visibility, Content & trust.
Themes Google extracted from this business’s reviews, by how often customers raise them. Not scored — this is what people say, not how findable the business is.
Recorded alongside the measurement to make it easier to judge, but carrying no weight in the Digital Visibility Score. See the methodology.
Companies House
Company 09796766 · 10.9 years old · active · SIC 71111
Real-user speed (CrUX)
Too little traffic to appear in Chrome’s public dataset
Lighthouse (lab, mobile)
Performance 68 · accessibility 68 · best practices 78 · SEO 85 — biggest losses: Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.; LCP request discovery; Document request latency
Google profile detail
40 photos · claimed · has a description · hours listed · 0 of 21 reviews are one star
Tom Spriggs Architect’s lowest-scoring pillars among those we publish remediation guidance for:
Content & trust (53/100) and Visibility (60/100) — read topical authority on how depth and coverage compound into citation-worthiness. Background on analysing these pillars: content & trust, visibility.