Measured 1 September 2026 via the PYC Exeter Architect Digital Visibility Index. Every figure is objective and reproducible from the methodology. Spotted an error? Request a correction.
These are specific, checkable faults on the site — not opinions about it.
Worth fixingStructured data present, but no LocalBusiness markupThe page describes something to machines, but not that it is a local business with an address and opening hours.
Worth knowingThe site has not changed in a long timeThe homepage last reported a change 5 years ago.
This firm against the sector median and the index leader, Living Space Architects, on every pillar.
Speed & CWV
58
Technical
88
Local presence
79
Visibility
0
AI search presence
0
Content & trust
53
this firm sector median leader
16A Architecture trails Living Space Architects by 195 points across 5 pillars, but 78% of that is AI search presence and Visibility alone. It already matches or beats the leader on Content & trust.
Living Space Architects leads the index with 82/100. The largest gaps are: AI search presence (0 vs 100); Visibility (0 vs 53); Speed & CWV (58 vs 79).
Recorded alongside the measurement to make it easier to judge, but carrying no weight in the Digital Visibility Score. See the methodology.
Companies House
No confident match on the registered name
Real-user speed (CrUX)
Too little traffic to appear in Chrome’s public dataset
Lighthouse (lab, mobile)
Performance 47 · accessibility 81 · best practices 54 · SEO 100 — biggest losses: Uses deprecated APIs; Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order; Browser errors were logged to the console
Google profile detail
22 photos · claimed · has a description · no hours listed
16A Architecture’s lowest-scoring pillars among those we publish remediation guidance for:
Visibility (0/100) — read topical authority on why ranking breadth across a sector beats chasing single terms. Background on analysing this pillar: visibility.