Skip to content

Studio Sintaa — Bristol Architect Digital Visibility Score

Digital Visibility Score: 51 / 100 · Rank 32 of 80

Measured 31 August 2026 via the PYC Bristol Architect Digital Visibility Index. Every figure is objective and reproducible from the methodology. Spotted an error? Request a correction.

Each pillar scored 0–100 against the sector median for this index. The final column is this firm's distance from that median.
PillarScoreMedianvs median
Speed & CWV7166+5
Technical8875+13
Local presence8176.5+4.5
Visibility00level
AI search presence00level
Content & trust2540.5−15.5
Pillar performance against the sector median. Bars right of centre are above the median, left are below.
Speed & CWV+5
Technical+13
Local presence+4.5
Visibility0
AI search presence0
Content & trust-15.5
1 critical problem found. These are specific, checkable faults on the site — not opinions about it.
  • CriticalSearch engines are being told not to index this siteThe site’s own robots.txt disallows crawling. Until that changes, nothing else on this page can help — the pages cannot enter the index in the first place.
Ranks for 0 of 12 keywords, in the local 3-pack for 0 keywords.
KeywordPosition
architects Bristolnot in top 100
architect Bristolnot in top 100
architectural services Bristolnot in top 100
house extension architect Bristolnot in top 100
planning application architect Bristolnot in top 100
listed building architect Bristolnot in top 100
residential architects Bristolnot in top 100
commercial architects Bristolnot in top 100
self build architect Bristolnot in top 100
loft conversion architect Bristolnot in top 100
barn conversion architect Bristolnot in top 100
conservation architect Bristolnot in top 100
This firm against the sector median and the index leader, 3bd Architects, on every pillar.
Speed & CWV71
Technical88
Local presence81
Visibility0
AI search presence0
Content & trust25

this firm sector median leader

Studio Sintaa trails 3bd Architects by 130 points across 5 pillars, but 62% of that is Content & trust and Visibility alone. It already matches or beats the leader on AI search presence.

Named in 0 of 5 AI answers. A domain citation is stronger evidence than a name mention.
Who are the best architects in Bristol?
Which architect in Bristol would you recommend for a house extension?
Top rated architectural practices in Bristol
I need an architect in Bristol - who should I contact?
Conservation architects in Bristol
Google Business Profile.
Rating5 / 5
Reviews2
Locations1
Reviews in last 90 days0
Address matches websiteyes
What each score is made of. Every input here is in the open dataset, so the arithmetic can be checked rather than taken on trust.
PillarScoreMade up of
Content & trust25about page: no · team page: no · credentials: no · blog or news: yes · homepage: 133 words
Visibility0ranks for 0 of 12 keywords · local 3-pack: 0
Local presence812 reviews · rated 5 · 0 new in 90 days
Technical88HTTPS: yes · page allows indexing: yes · robots.txt allows crawling: no · sitemap: yes · structured data: yes
  • Content & trust: 25/100, below the sector median of 40.5.

3bd Architects leads the index with 70/100. The largest gaps are: Content & trust (25 vs 75); Visibility (0 vs 31); Speed & CWV (71 vs 100).

  1. Build local landing pages for the core keyword basket to lift organic and local-pack appearance.
  2. Publish structured, citable content and entity schema so AI engines surface the business for core local queries.
  3. Add about/team pages, and refresh stale content.
The firms nearest Studio Sintaa in this ranking, beyond the two either side.
FirmRankScoreWhy it is here
Childs Sulzmann Architects#3051/1002 places above you
Catscad Ltd#3450/1002 places below you
OSP Architecture - Bristol#2952/1003 places above you
gcp Chartered Architects#3550/1003 places below you
Recorded alongside the measurement to make it easier to judge, but carrying no weight in the Digital Visibility Score. See the methodology.
Companies HouseNo confident match on the registered name
Real-user speed (CrUX)Too little traffic to appear in Chrome’s public dataset
Lighthouse (lab, mobile)Performance 74 · accessibility 100 · best practices 81 · SEO 100 — biggest losses: Reduce unused JavaScript; Forced reflow; Does not use HTTPS
Google profile detail141 photos · claimed · has a description · hours listed
Backlinks50 referring domains · 96 links · rank 0
Site structure1 pages crawled · 29 internal links per page · reachable in: contact 1 click · 0% of links use a generic anchor · 3 sitemap pages not reachable by following links
Sitemap3 URLs listed · declared in robots.txt · newest entry 556 days old · 3 of 3 sampled URLs resolve

Studio Sintaa’s lowest-scoring pillars among those we publish remediation guidance for:


How this is measured: see the index methodology, and the statistical methods behind each pillar. This index is published by PYC; if you want this score moved, start here.