Measured 31 August 2026 via the PYC Bristol Architect Digital Visibility Index. Every figure is objective and reproducible from the methodology. Spotted an error? Request a correction.
1 critical problem found. These are specific, checkable faults on the site — not opinions about it.
CriticalSearch engines are being told not to index this siteThe site’s own robots.txt disallows crawling. Until that changes, nothing else on this page can help — the pages cannot enter the index in the first place.
This firm against the sector median and the index leader, 3bd Architects, on every pillar.
Speed & CWV
71
Technical
88
Local presence
81
Visibility
0
AI search presence
0
Content & trust
25
this firm sector median leader
Studio Sintaa trails 3bd Architects by 130 points across 5 pillars, but 62% of that is Content & trust and Visibility alone. It already matches or beats the leader on AI search presence.
Recorded alongside the measurement to make it easier to judge, but carrying no weight in the Digital Visibility Score. See the methodology.
Companies House
No confident match on the registered name
Real-user speed (CrUX)
Too little traffic to appear in Chrome’s public dataset
Lighthouse (lab, mobile)
Performance 74 · accessibility 100 · best practices 81 · SEO 100 — biggest losses: Reduce unused JavaScript; Forced reflow; Does not use HTTPS
Google profile detail
141 photos · claimed · has a description · hours listed
Backlinks
50 referring domains · 96 links · rank 0
Site structure
1 pages crawled · 29 internal links per page · reachable in: contact 1 click · 0% of links use a generic anchor · 3 sitemap pages not reachable by following links
Sitemap
3 URLs listed · declared in robots.txt · newest entry 556 days old · 3 of 3 sampled URLs resolve
Studio Sintaa’s lowest-scoring pillars among those we publish remediation guidance for:
Visibility (0/100) — read topical authority on why ranking breadth across a sector beats chasing single terms. Background on analysing this pillar: visibility.