Measured 31 August 2026 via the PYC Bristol Architect Digital Visibility Index. Every figure is objective and reproducible from the methodology. Spotted an error? Request a correction.
These are specific, checkable faults on the site — not opinions about it.
Worth fixingNo XML sitemap foundSearch engines have to discover every page by following links. On a small site that is survivable; on a large one it is not.
This firm against the sector median and the index leader, 3bd Architects, on every pillar.
Speed & CWV
58
Technical
88
Local presence
86
Visibility
0
AI search presence
0
Content & trust
20
this firm sector median leader
Stantec trails 3bd Architects by 143 points across 5 pillars, but 68% of that is Content & trust and Speed & CWV alone. It already matches or beats the leader on AI search presence.
Largest Contentful Paint measured two ways: one throttled lab run, against 28 days of real Chrome users.
Lab (Lighthouse, mobile)
4.0s
one throttled load on a datacentre machine
Field (real users)
3.1s
75th percentile of actual Chrome visitors over 28 days
The lab figure is 1.3× the real-user figure. The lab test looks acceptable while real visitors are failing Core Web Vitals. This is the more serious direction of disagreement: the problem is real and a one-off lab run is missing it. The metric failing for real users is loading (LCP) and layout shift (CLS).
Stantec’s lowest-scoring pillars among those we publish remediation guidance for:
Visibility (0/100) — read topical authority on why ranking breadth across a sector beats chasing single terms. Background on analysing this pillar: visibility.