Skip to content

Stantec — Bristol Architect Digital Visibility Score

Digital Visibility Score: 48 / 100 · Rank 48 of 80

Measured 31 August 2026 via the PYC Bristol Architect Digital Visibility Index. Every figure is objective and reproducible from the methodology. Spotted an error? Request a correction.

Each pillar scored 0–100 against the sector median for this index. The final column is this firm's distance from that median.
PillarScoreMedianvs median
Speed & CWV5866−8
Technical8875+13
Local presence8676.5+9.5
Visibility00level
AI search presence00level
Content & trust2040.5−20.5
Pillar performance against the sector median. Bars right of centre are above the median, left are below.
Speed & CWV-8
Technical+13
Local presence+9.5
Visibility0
AI search presence0
Content & trust-20.5
These are specific, checkable faults on the site — not opinions about it.
  • Worth fixingNo XML sitemap foundSearch engines have to discover every page by following links. On a small site that is survivable; on a large one it is not.
Ranks for 0 of 12 keywords, in the local 3-pack for 0 keywords.
KeywordPosition
architects Bristolnot in top 100
architect Bristolnot in top 100
architectural services Bristolnot in top 100
house extension architect Bristolnot in top 100
planning application architect Bristolnot in top 100
listed building architect Bristolnot in top 100
residential architects Bristolnot in top 100
commercial architects Bristolnot in top 100
self build architect Bristolnot in top 100
loft conversion architect Bristolnot in top 100
barn conversion architect Bristolnot in top 100
conservation architect Bristolnot in top 100
This firm against the sector median and the index leader, 3bd Architects, on every pillar.
Speed & CWV58
Technical88
Local presence86
Visibility0
AI search presence0
Content & trust20

this firm sector median leader

Stantec trails 3bd Architects by 143 points across 5 pillars, but 68% of that is Content & trust and Speed & CWV alone. It already matches or beats the leader on AI search presence.

Named in 0 of 5 AI answers. A domain citation is stronger evidence than a name mention.
Who are the best architects in Bristol?
Which architect in Bristol would you recommend for a house extension?
Top rated architectural practices in Bristol
I need an architect in Bristol - who should I contact?
Conservation architects in Bristol
Google Business Profile.
Rating4.9 / 5
Reviews8
Locations1
Reviews in last 90 days0
Address matches websiteyes
Largest Contentful Paint measured two ways: one throttled lab run, against 28 days of real Chrome users.
Lab (Lighthouse, mobile)4.0sone throttled load on a datacentre machine
Field (real users)3.1s75th percentile of actual Chrome visitors over 28 days

The lab figure is 1.3× the real-user figure. The lab test looks acceptable while real visitors are failing Core Web Vitals. This is the more serious direction of disagreement: the problem is real and a one-off lab run is missing it. The metric failing for real users is loading (LCP) and layout shift (CLS).

What each score is made of. Every input here is in the open dataset, so the arithmetic can be checked rather than taken on trust.
PillarScoreMade up of
Content & trust20about page: no · team page: no · credentials: no · blog or news: no · homepage: 4,700 words
Visibility0ranks for 0 of 12 keywords · local 3-pack: 0
Local presence868 reviews · rated 4.9 · 0 new in 90 days
Technical88HTTPS: yes · page allows indexing: yes · robots.txt allows crawling: yes · sitemap: no · structured data: yes
  • Content & trust: 20/100, below the sector median of 40.5.

3bd Architects leads the index with 70/100. The largest gaps are: Content & trust (20 vs 75); Speed & CWV (58 vs 100); Visibility (0 vs 31).

  1. Build local landing pages for the core keyword basket to lift organic and local-pack appearance.
  2. Publish structured, citable content and entity schema so AI engines surface the business for core local queries.
  3. Add about/team pages, and refresh stale content.
The firms nearest Stantec in this ranking, beyond the two either side.
FirmRankScoreWhy it is here
Piquant Collective#4648/1002 places above you
7 Architects#5046/1002 places below you
Apply Structure Ltd#4548/1003 places above you
Extension Architecture Bristol - Extension Plans & Design#5146/1003 places below you
Recorded alongside the measurement to make it easier to judge, but carrying no weight in the Digital Visibility Score. See the methodology.
Companies HouseNo confident match on the registered name
Real-user speed (CrUX)LCP 3051ms · INP 153ms · CLS 0.15 · does not pass Core Web Vitals
Lighthouse (lab, mobile)Performance 80 · accessibility 90 · best practices 100 · SEO 92 — biggest losses: Avoid large layout shifts; Render-blocking requests; `[aria-hidden="true"]` elements contain focusable descendents
Google profile detail9 photos · claimed · has a description · hours listed · 0 of 8 reviews are one star
Backlinks12974 referring domains · 95974 links · rank 399 · 116 broken
Site structure5 pages crawled · 2.6 internal links per page · reachable in: services 1 click · 0% of links use a generic anchor
Sitemapdeclared in robots.txt

Stantec’s lowest-scoring pillars among those we publish remediation guidance for:


How this is measured: see the index methodology, and the statistical methods behind each pillar. This index is published by PYC; if you want this score moved, start here.