Measured 31 August 2026 via the PYC Bristol Architect Digital Visibility Index. Every figure is objective and reproducible from the methodology. Spotted an error? Request a correction.
These are specific, checkable faults on the site — not opinions about it.
Worth fixingNo XML sitemap foundSearch engines have to discover every page by following links. On a small site that is survivable; on a large one it is not.
Worth fixingNo structured data on the homepageNothing tells a search engine or an assistant what this business is, where it is, or what it does — in machine-readable terms.
This firm against the sector median and the index leader, 3bd Architects, on every pillar.
Speed & CWV
88
Technical
43
Local presence
86
Visibility
0
AI search presence
0
Content & trust
29
this firm sector median leader
7 Architects trails 3bd Architects by 149 points across 5 pillars, but 69% of that is Technical and Content & trust alone. It already matches or beats the leader on AI search presence.
Recorded alongside the measurement to make it easier to judge, but carrying no weight in the Digital Visibility Score. See the methodology.
Companies House
No confident match on the registered name
Real-user speed (CrUX)
Too little traffic to appear in Chrome’s public dataset
Lighthouse (lab, mobile)
Performance 93 · accessibility 92 · best practices 100 · SEO 100 — biggest losses: Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.; Render-blocking requests; Document does not have a main landmark.
Google profile detail
6 photos · claimed · has a description · hours listed · 0 of 6 reviews are one star
Backlinks
40 referring domains · 41 links · rank 0
Site structure
1 pages crawled · 1 internal links per page · 0% of links use a generic anchor
7 Architects’s lowest-scoring pillars among those we publish remediation guidance for:
Visibility (0/100) — read topical authority on why ranking breadth across a sector beats chasing single terms. Background on analysing this pillar: visibility.