Skip to content

Rolfing with Kate — Bath Physiotherapy Digital Visibility Score

Digital Visibility Score: 46 / 100 · Rank 52 of 67

Measured 31 August 2026 via the PYC Bath Physiotherapy Digital Visibility Index. Every figure is objective and reproducible from the methodology. Spotted an error? Request a correction.

Each pillar scored 0–100 against the sector median for this index. The final column is this firm's distance from that median.
PillarScoreMedianvs median
Speed & CWV6262level
Technical8888level
Local presence6373−10
Visibility04−4
AI search presence00level
Content & trust3053−23
Pillar performance against the sector median. Bars right of centre are above the median, left are below.
Speed & CWV0
Technical0
Local presence-10
Visibility-4
AI search presence0
Content & trust-23
1 critical problem found. These are specific, checkable faults on the site — not opinions about it.
  • CriticalSearch engines are being told not to index this siteThe site’s own robots.txt disallows crawling. Until that changes, nothing else on this page can help — the pages cannot enter the index in the first place.
  • Worth fixingVery little published contentThe homepage carries 252 words and the site links to no blog, news or insights section. There is little here for a search engine to match, or for an assistant to quote.
Ranks for 0 of 12 keywords, in the local 3-pack for 0 keywords.
KeywordPosition
physiotherapy Bathnot in top 100
physio Bathnot in top 100
best physiotherapist Bathnot in top 100
sports injury clinic Bathnot in top 100
back pain treatment Bathnot in top 100
chiropractor Bathnot in top 100
osteopath Bathnot in top 100
private physio Bathnot in top 100
rehabilitation clinic Bathnot in top 100
physiotherapy Widcombenot in top 100
physiotherapy Lansdownnot in top 100
physio Widcombenot in top 100
This firm against the sector median and the index leader, Hybrid Health Bath, on every pillar.
Technical88
Local presence63
Visibility0
AI search presence0
Content & trust30

this firm sector median leader

Rolfing with Kate trails Hybrid Health Bath by 208 points across 4 pillars, but 61% of that is AI search presence and Visibility alone. It already matches or beats the leader on Technical.

Named in 0 of 5 AI answers. A domain citation is stronger evidence than a name mention.
Who are the best physiotherapists in Bath?
Which physio clinic in Bath would you recommend for a sports injury?
Top rated physiotherapy in Bath
I have back pain and live in Bath - who should I see?
Best physiotherapy in Widcombe, Bath
Google Business Profile.
Rating5 / 5
Reviews2
Locations1
Reviews in last 90 days0
Address matches websiteyes
What each score is made of. Every input here is in the open dataset, so the arithmetic can be checked rather than taken on trust.
PillarScoreMade up of
Content & trust30about page: yes · team page: no · credentials: no · blog or news: no · homepage: 252 words
Visibility0ranks for 0 of 12 keywords · local 3-pack: 0
Local presence632 reviews · rated 5 · 0 new in 90 days
Technical88HTTPS: yes · page allows indexing: yes · robots.txt allows crawling: no · sitemap: yes · structured data: yes
  • Local presence: 63/100, below the sector median of 73.
  • Content & trust: 30/100, below the sector median of 53.

Hybrid Health Bath leads the index with 80/100. The largest gaps are: AI search presence (0 vs 80); Visibility (0 vs 46); Content & trust (30 vs 75).

  1. Build local landing pages for the core keyword basket to lift organic and local-pack appearance.
  2. Publish structured, citable content and entity schema so AI engines surface the business for core local queries.
  3. Add about/team pages, and refresh stale content.
The firms nearest Rolfing with Kate in this ranking, beyond the two either side.
FirmRankScoreWhy it is here
Nathan Jensen Clinic#5046/1002 places above you
Ellena West Osteopathy#5443/1002 places below you
Clare Doyle Physiotherapist#4946/1003 places above you
KILNER OSTEOPATHY#5543/1003 places below you
Recorded alongside the measurement to make it easier to judge, but carrying no weight in the Digital Visibility Score. See the methodology.
Companies HouseNo confident match on the registered name
Real-user speed (CrUX)Too little traffic to appear in Chrome’s public dataset
Lighthouse (lab, mobile)Performance 61 · accessibility 95 · best practices 81 · SEO 100 — biggest losses: LCP breakdown; Buttons do not have an accessible name; Minimize main-thread work
Google profile detail1 photo · claimed · no description · hours listed
Backlinks33 referring domains · 33 links · rank 0
Site structure1 pages crawled · 5 internal links per page · reachable in: about 1 click · 0% of links use a generic anchor · 4 sitemap pages not reachable by following links
Sitemap4 URLs listed · declared in robots.txt · newest entry 52 days old · 4 of 4 sampled URLs resolve

Rolfing with Kate’s lowest-scoring pillars among those we publish remediation guidance for:


How this is measured: see the index methodology, and the statistical methods behind each pillar. This index is published by PYC; if you want this score moved, start here.