Skip to content

James Gallie — Bath Architect Digital Visibility Score

Digital Visibility Score: 44 / 100 · Rank 63 of 80

Measured 31 August 2026 via the PYC Bath Architect Digital Visibility Index. Every figure is objective and reproducible from the methodology. Spotted an error? Request a correction.

Each pillar scored 0–100 against the sector median for this index. The final column is this firm's distance from that median.
PillarScoreMedianvs median
Speed & CWV8563+22
Technical5088−38
Local presence5978.5−19.5
Visibility00level
AI search presence00level
Content & trust5037+13
Pillar performance against the sector median. Bars right of centre are above the median, left are below.
Speed & CWV+22
Technical-38
Local presence-19.5
Visibility0
AI search presence0
Content & trust+13
1 critical problem found. These are specific, checkable faults on the site — not opinions about it.
  • CriticalThe site is not served over HTTPSBrowsers mark it as not secure, and it is a ranking signal in its own right.
  • Worth fixingNo XML sitemap foundSearch engines have to discover every page by following links. On a small site that is survivable; on a large one it is not.
  • Worth fixingNo structured data on the homepageNothing tells a search engine or an assistant what this business is, where it is, or what it does — in machine-readable terms.
Ranks for 0 of 12 keywords, in the local 3-pack for 0 keywords.
KeywordPosition
architects Bathnot in top 100
architect Bathnot in top 100
architectural services Bathnot in top 100
house extension architect Bathnot in top 100
planning application architect Bathnot in top 100
listed building architect Bathnot in top 100
residential architects Bathnot in top 100
commercial architects Bathnot in top 100
self build architect Bathnot in top 100
loft conversion architect Bathnot in top 100
barn conversion architect Bathnot in top 100
conservation architect Bathnot in top 100
This firm against the sector median and the index leader, Designscape Architects, on every pillar.
Speed & CWV85
Technical50
Local presence59
Visibility0
AI search presence0
Content & trust50

this firm sector median leader

James Gallie trails Designscape Architects by 211 points across 6 pillars, but 54% of that is AI search presence and Visibility alone.

Named in 0 of 5 AI answers. A domain citation is stronger evidence than a name mention.
Who are the best architects in Bath?
Which architect in Bath would you recommend for a house extension?
Top rated architectural practices in Bath
I need an architect in Bath - who should I contact?
Conservation architects in Bath
What each score is made of. Every input here is in the open dataset, so the arithmetic can be checked rather than taken on trust.
PillarScoreMade up of
Content & trust50about page: yes · team page: no · credentials: no · blog or news: yes · homepage: 29 words · last changed: 80 days ago
Visibility0ranks for 0 of 12 keywords · local 3-pack: 0
Local presence590 reviews · 0 new in 90 days
Technical50HTTPS: no · page allows indexing: yes · robots.txt allows crawling: yes · sitemap: no · structured data: no
  • Technical: 50/100, below the sector median of 88.
  • Local presence: 59/100, below the sector median of 78.5.

Designscape Architects leads the index with 80/100. The largest gaps are: AI search presence (0 vs 60); Visibility (0 vs 53); Technical (50 vs 100).

  1. Build local landing pages for the core keyword basket to lift organic and local-pack appearance.
  2. Publish structured, citable content and entity schema so AI engines surface the business for core local queries.
  3. Add valid LocalBusiness schema, fix indexability, and ensure a fresh XML sitemap is referenced in robots.txt.
The firms nearest James Gallie in this ranking, beyond the two either side.
FirmRankScoreWhy it is here
Ailtire Architects#6144/1002 places above you
Kashdan Brown Architects#6543/1002 places below you
mimetico#6045/1003 places above you
MOORE YACHT DESIGN#6642/1003 places below you
Recorded alongside the measurement to make it easier to judge, but carrying no weight in the Digital Visibility Score. See the methodology.
Companies HouseNo confident match on the registered name
Real-user speed (CrUX)Too little traffic to appear in Chrome’s public dataset
Lighthouse (lab, mobile)Performance 90 · accessibility 88 · best practices 74 · SEO 85 — biggest losses: Document does not have a meta description; Reduce unused CSS; Network dependency tree
Google profile detail1 photo · unclaimed · no description · no hours listed
Backlinks40 referring domains · 44 links · rank 7
Site structure25 pages crawled · 22.9 internal links per page · reachable in: contact 1 click, about 1 click · 0% of links use a generic anchor
Sitemapnot declared in robots.txt

James Gallie’s lowest-scoring pillars among those we publish remediation guidance for:


How this is measured: see the index methodology, and the statistical methods behind each pillar. This index is published by PYC; if you want this score moved, start here.