Skip to content

Ailtire Architects — Bath Architect Digital Visibility Score

Digital Visibility Score: 44 / 100 · Rank 61 of 80

Measured 31 August 2026 via the PYC Bath Architect Digital Visibility Index. Every figure is objective and reproducible from the methodology. Spotted an error? Request a correction.

Each pillar scored 0–100 against the sector median for this index. The final column is this firm's distance from that median.
PillarScoreMedianvs median
Speed & CWV6263−1
Technical8888level
Local presence5978.5−19.5
Visibility00level
AI search presence00level
Content & trust2037−17
Pillar performance against the sector median. Bars right of centre are above the median, left are below.
Speed & CWV-1
Technical0
Local presence-19.5
Visibility0
AI search presence0
Content & trust-17
1 critical problem found. These are specific, checkable faults on the site — not opinions about it.
  • CriticalSearch engines are being told not to index this siteThe site’s own robots.txt disallows crawling. Until that changes, nothing else on this page can help — the pages cannot enter the index in the first place.
  • Worth fixingVery little published contentThe homepage carries 64 words and the site links to no blog, news or insights section. There is little here for a search engine to match, or for an assistant to quote.
  • Worth knowingThe site has not changed in a long timeThe homepage last reported a change 4.3 years ago.
Ranks for 0 of 12 keywords, in the local 3-pack for 0 keywords.
KeywordPosition
architects Bathnot in top 100
architect Bathnot in top 100
architectural services Bathnot in top 100
house extension architect Bathnot in top 100
planning application architect Bathnot in top 100
listed building architect Bathnot in top 100
residential architects Bathnot in top 100
commercial architects Bathnot in top 100
self build architect Bathnot in top 100
loft conversion architect Bathnot in top 100
barn conversion architect Bathnot in top 100
conservation architect Bathnot in top 100
This firm against the sector median and the index leader, Designscape Architects, on every pillar.
Speed & CWV62
Technical88
Local presence59
Visibility0
AI search presence0
Content & trust20

this firm sector median leader

Ailtire Architects trails Designscape Architects by 226 points across 6 pillars, but 50% of that is AI search presence and Visibility alone.

Named in 0 of 5 AI answers. A domain citation is stronger evidence than a name mention.
Who are the best architects in Bath?
Which architect in Bath would you recommend for a house extension?
Top rated architectural practices in Bath
I need an architect in Bath - who should I contact?
Conservation architects in Bath
What each score is made of. Every input here is in the open dataset, so the arithmetic can be checked rather than taken on trust.
PillarScoreMade up of
Content & trust20about page: yes · team page: no · credentials: no · blog or news: no · homepage: 64 words · last changed: 1560 days ago
Visibility0ranks for 0 of 12 keywords · local 3-pack: 0
Local presence590 reviews · 0 new in 90 days
Technical88HTTPS: yes · page allows indexing: yes · robots.txt allows crawling: no · sitemap: yes · structured data: yes
  • Local presence: 59/100, below the sector median of 78.5.
  • Content & trust: 20/100, below the sector median of 37.

Designscape Architects leads the index with 80/100. The largest gaps are: AI search presence (0 vs 60); Visibility (0 vs 53); Speed & CWV (62 vs 99).

  1. Build local landing pages for the core keyword basket to lift organic and local-pack appearance.
  2. Publish structured, citable content and entity schema so AI engines surface the business for core local queries.
  3. Add about/team pages, and refresh stale content.
The firms nearest Ailtire Architects in this ranking, beyond the two either side.
FirmRankScoreWhy it is here
INK Architecture#5945/1002 places above you
James Gallie#6344/1002 places below you
Hambury Hird Design Ltd#5845/1003 places above you
Anthony Paine Limited#6443/1003 places below you
Recorded alongside the measurement to make it easier to judge, but carrying no weight in the Digital Visibility Score. See the methodology.
Companies HouseNo confident match on the registered name
Real-user speed (CrUX)Too little traffic to appear in Chrome’s public dataset
Lighthouse (lab, mobile)Performance 64 · accessibility 100 · best practices 81 · SEO 85 — biggest losses: Reduce unused CSS; Legacy JavaScript; Document request latency
Google profile detail3 photos · claimed · no description · no hours listed
Backlinks19 referring domains · 21 links · rank 0
Site structure1 pages crawled · 14 internal links per page · reachable in: contact 1 click, about 1 click, services 1 click · 0% of links use a generic anchor
Sitemapnot declared in robots.txt

Ailtire Architects’s lowest-scoring pillars among those we publish remediation guidance for:


How this is measured: see the index methodology, and the statistical methods behind each pillar. This index is published by PYC; if you want this score moved, start here.