Measured 29 August 2026 via the PYC Cheltenham Construction Digital Visibility Index. Every figure is objective and reproducible from the methodology. Spotted an error? Request a correction.
These are specific, checkable faults on the site — not opinions about it.
Worth fixingNo XML sitemap foundSearch engines have to discover every page by following links. On a small site that is survivable; on a large one it is not.
This firm against the sector median and the index leader, The Little Conservatory Company LTD, on every pillar.
Speed & CWV
36
Technical
0
Local presence
67
Visibility
0
AI search presence
0
this firm sector median leader
Greet Building Services Ltd trails The Little Conservatory Company LTD by 200 points across 4 pillars, but 70% of that is Technical and Speed & CWV alone. It already matches or beats the leader on AI search presence.
The Little Conservatory Company LTD leads the index with 68/100. The largest gaps are: Technical (0 vs 100); Speed & CWV (36 vs 75); Visibility (0 vs 31).
Recorded alongside the measurement to make it easier to judge, but carrying no weight in the Digital Visibility Score. See the methodology.
Companies House
Company 01882103 · 41.6 years old · active · SIC 41100, 41202
Real-user speed (CrUX)
Too little traffic to appear in Chrome’s public dataset
Lighthouse (lab, mobile)
Performance 44 · accessibility 83 · best practices 81 · SEO 92 — biggest losses: Links are not crawlable; Render-blocking requests; Largest Contentful Paint
Google profile detail
7 photos · claimed · has a description · hours listed
Greet Building Services Ltd’s lowest-scoring pillars among those we publish remediation guidance for:
Technical (0/100) — read SEO automation on running these technical checks continuously rather than once a quarter. Background on analysing this pillar: technical.
Visibility (0/100) — read topical authority on why ranking breadth across a sector beats chasing single terms. Background on analysing this pillar: visibility.