Measured 14 September 2026 via the PYC Bristol Double Glazing Digital Visibility Index. Every figure is objective and reproducible from the methodology. Spotted an error? Request a correction.
1 critical problem found. These are specific, checkable faults on the site — not opinions about it.
CriticalSearch engines are being told not to index this siteThe site’s own robots.txt disallows crawling. Until that changes, nothing else on this page can help — the pages cannot enter the index in the first place.
This firm against the sector median and the index leader, The Window Hub, on every pillar.
Speed & CWV
87
Technical
88
Local presence
75
Visibility
29
AI search presence
40
Content & trust
35
this firm sector median leader
Summer Windows trails The Window Hub by 133 points across 5 pillars, but 66% of that is Content & trust and AI search presence alone. It already matches or beats the leader on Technical.
The Window Hub leads the index with 83/100. The largest gaps are: Content & trust (35 vs 83); AI search presence (40 vs 80); Local presence (75 vs 98).
Recorded alongside the measurement to make it easier to judge, but carrying no weight in the Digital Visibility Score. See the methodology.
Companies House
No confident match on the registered name
Real-user speed (CrUX)
Too little traffic to appear in Chrome’s public dataset
Site structure
7 pages crawled · 18 internal links per page · reachable in: contact 1 click, about 1 click · 0% of links use a generic anchor · 0 sitemap pages not reachable by following links
Sitemap
7 URLs listed · declared in robots.txt · newest entry 65 days old · 5 of 5 sampled URLs resolve
Summer Windows’s lowest-scoring pillars among those we publish remediation guidance for:
Visibility (29/100) and Content & trust (35/100) — read topical authority on why ranking breadth across a sector beats chasing single terms. Background on analysing these pillars: visibility, content & trust.