Skip to content

Mitchell & Dickinson — Bristol Double Glazing Digital Visibility Score

Digital Visibility Score: 54 / 100 · Rank 39 of 116

Measured 14 September 2026 via the PYC Bristol Double Glazing Digital Visibility Index. Every figure is objective and reproducible from the methodology. Spotted an error? Request a correction.

Each pillar scored 0–100 against the sector median for this index. The final column is this firm's distance from that median.
PillarScoreMedianvs median
Speed & CWV6162−1
Technical10088+12
Local presence5974−15
Visibility210+21
AI search presence00level
Content & trust7037+33
Pillar performance against the sector median. Bars right of centre are above the median, left are below.
Speed & CWV-1
Technical+12
Local presence-15
Visibility+21
AI search presence0
Content & trust+33
These are specific, checkable faults on the site — not opinions about it.
  • Worth knowingThe site has not changed in a long timeThe homepage last reported a change 7.9 years ago.
Ranks for 5 of 12 keywords, average position 27.2, in the local 3-pack for 0 keywords.
KeywordPosition
double glazing Bristol#26
double glazing companies Bristol#26
upvc windows Bristolnot in top 100
replacement windows Bristolnot in top 100
window fitters Bristolnot in top 100
best double glazing Bristol#28
double glazing installers Bristol#14
composite doors Bristolnot in top 100
conservatories Bristolnot in top 100
double glazing Bishopstonnot in top 100
double glazing Fishponds#42
upvc windows Bishopstonnot in top 100
This firm against the sector median and the index leader, The Window Hub, on every pillar.
Speed & CWV61
Technical100
Local presence59
Visibility21
AI search presence0
Content & trust70

this firm sector median leader

Mitchell & Dickinson trails The Window Hub by 188 points across 5 pillars, but 63% of that is AI search presence and Local presence alone. It already matches or beats the leader on Technical.

Ranked between #11 and #20 — one page from the first, ordered by how close.
double glazing installers Bristol#14

1 position sits between #11 and #20 — one page away, and the cheapest ranking work available to this firm.

Named in 0 of 5 AI answers. A domain citation is stronger evidence than a name mention.
Who are the best double glazing companies in Bristol?
Which window installer in Bristol would you recommend for replacement windows?
Top rated upvc window fitters in Bristol
I need new double glazing in Bristol - who should I contact?
Best double glazing companies in Bishopston, Bristol
What each score is made of. Every input here is in the open dataset, so the arithmetic can be checked rather than taken on trust.
PillarScoreMade up of
Content & trust70about page: yes · team page: yes · credentials: no · blog or news: yes · homepage: 1,372 words · last changed: 2881 days ago
Visibility21ranks for 5 of 12 keywords · average position 27.2 · local 3-pack: 0
Local presence590 reviews
Technical100HTTPS: yes · page allows indexing: yes · robots.txt allows crawling: yes · sitemap: yes · structured data: yes
  • Local presence: 59/100, below the sector median of 74.

The Window Hub leads the index with 83/100. The largest gaps are: AI search presence (0 vs 80); Local presence (59 vs 98); Visibility (21 vs 50).

  1. Publish structured, citable content and entity schema so AI engines surface the business for core local queries.
  2. Build local landing pages for the core keyword basket to lift organic and local-pack appearance.
  3. Restart Google review generation and complete the Business Profile to close the local-pack gap.
The firms nearest Mitchell & Dickinson in this ranking, beyond the two either side.
FirmRankScoreWhy it is here
The Bristol Sash Window Company#3755/1002 places above you
Glazerite South West Division#4153/1002 places below you
Roman Glass#3655/1003 places above you
Profab Windows#4253/1003 places below you
Recorded alongside the measurement to make it easier to judge, but carrying no weight in the Digital Visibility Score. See the methodology.
Companies HouseNo confident match on the registered name
Real-user speed (CrUX)LCP 3401ms · INP 128ms · CLS 0 · does not pass Core Web Vitals
Site structure25 pages crawled · 208.7 internal links per page · reachable in: contact 1 click, about 1 click, team 1 click, services 1 click · 0% of links use a generic anchor
Sitemap66 URLs listed · declared in robots.txt · newest entry 3 days old · 5 of 5 sampled URLs resolve

Mitchell & Dickinson’s lowest-scoring pillars among those we publish remediation guidance for:


How this is measured: see the index methodology, and the statistical methods behind each pillar. This index is published by PYC; if you want this score moved, start here.