Skip to content

Muxworthy Richard — Bristol Architect Digital Visibility Score

Digital Visibility Score: 36 / 100 · Rank 73 of 80

Measured 31 August 2026 via the PYC Bristol Architect Digital Visibility Index. Every figure is objective and reproducible from the methodology. Spotted an error? Request a correction.

Each pillar scored 0–100 against the sector median for this index. The final column is this firm's distance from that median.
PillarScoreMedianvs median
Speed & CWV10066+34
Technical075−75
Local presence6376.5−13.5
Visibility00level
AI search presence00level
Content & trust40.5not measured
Pillar performance against the sector median. Bars right of centre are above the median, left are below.
Speed & CWV+34
Technical-75
Local presence-13.5
Visibility0
AI search presence0
Content & trustnot measured
1 critical problem found. These are specific, checkable faults on the site — not opinions about it.
  • CriticalThe site is not served over HTTPSBrowsers mark it as not secure, and it is a ranking signal in its own right.
  • Worth fixingNo XML sitemap foundSearch engines have to discover every page by following links. On a small site that is survivable; on a large one it is not.
Ranks for 0 of 12 keywords, in the local 3-pack for 0 keywords.
KeywordPosition
architects Bristolnot in top 100
architect Bristolnot in top 100
architectural services Bristolnot in top 100
house extension architect Bristolnot in top 100
planning application architect Bristolnot in top 100
listed building architect Bristolnot in top 100
residential architects Bristolnot in top 100
commercial architects Bristolnot in top 100
self build architect Bristolnot in top 100
loft conversion architect Bristolnot in top 100
barn conversion architect Bristolnot in top 100
conservation architect Bristolnot in top 100
This firm against the sector median and the index leader, 3bd Architects, on every pillar.
Speed & CWV100
Technical0
Local presence63
Visibility0
AI search presence0

this firm sector median leader

Muxworthy Richard trails 3bd Architects by 157 points across 3 pillars, but 83% of that is Technical and Visibility alone. It already matches or beats the leader on Speed & CWV, AI search presence.

Named in 0 of 5 AI answers. A domain citation is stronger evidence than a name mention.
Who are the best architects in Bristol?
Which architect in Bristol would you recommend for a house extension?
Top rated architectural practices in Bristol
I need an architect in Bristol - who should I contact?
Conservation architects in Bristol
What each score is made of. Every input here is in the open dataset, so the arithmetic can be checked rather than taken on trust.
PillarScoreMade up of
Visibility0ranks for 0 of 12 keywords · local 3-pack: 0
Local presence630 reviews · 0 new in 90 days
Technical0HTTPS: no · page allows indexing: — · robots.txt allows crawling: — · sitemap: no · structured data: —
  • Technical: 0/100, below the sector median of 75.
  • Local presence: 63/100, below the sector median of 76.5.

3bd Architects leads the index with 70/100. The largest gaps are: Technical (0 vs 100); Visibility (0 vs 31); Local presence (63 vs 89).

  1. Add valid LocalBusiness schema, fix indexability, and ensure a fresh XML sitemap is referenced in robots.txt.
  2. Build local landing pages for the core keyword basket to lift organic and local-pack appearance.
  3. Publish structured, citable content and entity schema so AI engines surface the business for core local queries.
The firms nearest Muxworthy Richard in this ranking, beyond the two either side.
FirmRankScoreWhy it is here
Blackwell Designs Ltd#7137/1002 places above you
George Harwood Ltd#7533/1002 places below you
XDelta Limited#7038/1003 places above you
Hatcher Prichard Architects#7619/1003 places below you
Recorded alongside the measurement to make it easier to judge, but carrying no weight in the Digital Visibility Score. See the methodology.
Companies HouseNo confident match on the registered name
Real-user speed (CrUX)Too little traffic to appear in Chrome’s public dataset
Lighthouse (lab, mobile)Performance 100 · accessibility 50 · best practices 67 · SEO 70 — biggest losses: Document does not have a main landmark.; Document doesn't have a `<title>` element; Charset declaration is missing or occurs too late in the HTML
Google profile detail2 photos · claimed · no description · hours listed
Backlinks28 referring domains · 42 links · rank 49 · 7 broken
Site structureNot crawled — homepage HTTP 403

Muxworthy Richard’s lowest-scoring pillars among those we publish remediation guidance for:

  • Technical (0/100) — read SEO automation on running these technical checks continuously rather than once a quarter. Background on analysing this pillar: technical.
  • Visibility (0/100) — read topical authority on why ranking breadth across a sector beats chasing single terms. Background on analysing this pillar: visibility.

How this is measured: see the index methodology, and the statistical methods behind each pillar. This index is published by PYC; if you want this score moved, start here.