Measured 31 August 2026 via the PYC Bristol Architect Digital Visibility Index. Every figure is objective and reproducible from the methodology. Spotted an error? Request a correction.
1 critical problem found. These are specific, checkable faults on the site — not opinions about it.
CriticalThe site is not served over HTTPSBrowsers mark it as not secure, and it is a ranking signal in its own right.
Worth fixingNo XML sitemap foundSearch engines have to discover every page by following links. On a small site that is survivable; on a large one it is not.
This firm against the sector median and the index leader, 3bd Architects, on every pillar.
Speed & CWV
100
Technical
0
Local presence
63
Visibility
0
AI search presence
0
this firm sector median leader
Muxworthy Richard trails 3bd Architects by 157 points across 3 pillars, but 83% of that is Technical and Visibility alone. It already matches or beats the leader on Speed & CWV, AI search presence.
Recorded alongside the measurement to make it easier to judge, but carrying no weight in the Digital Visibility Score. See the methodology.
Companies House
No confident match on the registered name
Real-user speed (CrUX)
Too little traffic to appear in Chrome’s public dataset
Lighthouse (lab, mobile)
Performance 100 · accessibility 50 · best practices 67 · SEO 70 — biggest losses: Document does not have a main landmark.; Document doesn't have a `<title>` element; Charset declaration is missing or occurs too late in the HTML
Google profile detail
2 photos · claimed · no description · hours listed
Muxworthy Richard’s lowest-scoring pillars among those we publish remediation guidance for:
Technical (0/100) — read SEO automation on running these technical checks continuously rather than once a quarter. Background on analysing this pillar: technical.
Visibility (0/100) — read topical authority on why ranking breadth across a sector beats chasing single terms. Background on analysing this pillar: visibility.