Skip to content

Winkworth Bath — Bath Estate Agent Digital Visibility Score

Digital Visibility Score: 67 / 100 · Rank 2 of 15

Measured 3 October 2026 via the PYC Bath Estate Agent Digital Visibility Index. Every figure is objective and reproducible from the methodology. Spotted an error? Request a correction.

Each pillar scored 0–100 against the sector median for this index. The final column is this firm's distance from that median.
PillarScoreMedianvs median
Speed & CWV6162−1
Technical10088+12
Local presence7885−7
Visibility2114+7
AI search presence4020+20
Content & trust10080+20
Pillar performance against the sector median. Bars right of centre are above the median, left are below.
Speed & CWV-1
Technical+12
Local presence-7
Visibility+7
AI search presence+20
Content & trust+20
Ranks for 5 of 12 keywords, average position 19.8, in the local 3-pack for 0 keywords.
KeywordPosition
estate agents Bath#13
best estate agents Bath#19
top estate agents Bath#14
letting agents Bathnot in top 100
sell my house Bathnot in top 100
house valuation Bathnot in top 100
property for sale Bathnot in top 100
estate agent fees Bath#23
rental properties Bathnot in top 100
estate agents Widcombenot in top 100
estate agents Lansdown#30
letting agents Widcombenot in top 100
This firm against the sector median and the index leader, Martin & Co Bath, on every pillar.
Speed & CWV61
Technical100
Local presence78
Visibility21
AI search presence40
Content & trust100

this firm sector median leader

Winkworth Bath trails Martin & Co Bath by 42 points across 3 pillars, but 98% of that is Local presence and AI search presence alone. It already matches or beats the leader on Technical, Visibility, Content & trust.

Ranked between #11 and #20 — one page from the first, ordered by how close.
estate agents Bath#13
top estate agents Bath#14
best estate agents Bath#19

3 positions sit between #11 and #20 — one page away, and the cheapest ranking work available to this firm.

Named in 2 of 5 AI answers. A domain citation is stronger evidence than a name mention.
✗Who are the best estate agents in Bath?
✗Which estate agent in Bath would you recommend for selling a house?
✓Top rated letting agents in Bathcited by domain
✓I am looking for an estate agent in Bath - who should I contact?cited by domain
✗Best estate agents in Widcombe, Bath
Google Business Profile.
Rating4.8 / 5
Reviews123
Locations1
Reviews in last 90 days1
Address matches websiteyes
Largest Contentful Paint measured two ways: one throttled lab run, against 28 days of real Chrome users.
Lab (Lighthouse, mobile)4.8sone throttled load on a datacentre machine
Field (real users)1.6s75th percentile of actual Chrome visitors over 28 days

The lab figure is 2.9× the real-user figure. The lab test looks acceptable while real visitors are failing Core Web Vitals. This is the more serious direction of disagreement: the problem is real and a one-off lab run is missing it. The metric failing for real users is layout shift (CLS).

Themes Google extracted from this business’s reviews, by how often customers raise them. Not scored — this is what people say, not how findable the business is.
  • efficiency10
  • proactive staff3
  • speedy process3
  • finding a tenant3
  • viewings3
  • rental support2
  • approachable team2
  • diligent agent2
  • query resolution2
  • relocation process2
What each score is made of. Every input here is in the open dataset, so the arithmetic can be checked rather than taken on trust.
PillarScoreMade up of
Content & trust100about page: yes · people introduced: yes · credentials: yes · blog or news: yes · homepage: 2,768 words
Visibility21ranks for 5 of 12 keywords · average position 19.8 · local 3-pack: 0
Local presence78123 reviews · rated 4.8 · 1 new in 90 days
Technical100HTTPS: yes · page allows indexing: yes · robots.txt allows crawling: yes · sitemap: yes · structured data: yes
  • No pillar falls materially below the sector median this quarter.

Martin & Co Bath leads the index with 73/100. The largest gaps are: Local presence (78 vs 99); AI search presence (40 vs 60).

  1. Build local landing pages for the core keyword basket to lift organic and local-pack appearance.
  2. Publish structured, citable content and entity schema so AI engines surface the business for core local queries.
  3. Cut mobile LCP below 2.5s (optimise images and remove render-blocking resources) — the biggest score and ranking lever.
The firms nearest Winkworth Bath in this ranking, beyond the two either side.
FirmRankScoreWhy it is here
Strattons and Partners#463/1002 places below you
Madison Oakley#561/1003 places below you
Allen & Harris Bath#660/1004 places below you
Bath Stone Property#760/1005 places below you
Recorded alongside the measurement to make it easier to judge, but carrying no weight in the Digital Visibility Score. See the methodology.
Companies HouseNo confident match on the registered name
Real-user speed (CrUX)LCP 1628ms · INP 169ms · CLS 0.11 · does not pass Core Web Vitals
Lighthouse (lab, mobile)Performance 53 · accessibility 76 · best practices 96 · SEO 92 — biggest losses: Minimize main-thread work; `[role]`s do not have all required `[aria-*]` attributes; Touch targets do not have sufficient size or spacing.
Google profile detail9 photos · claimed · no description · hours listed · 5 of 123 reviews are one star
Backlinks1805 referring domains · 273994 links · rank 482 · 47 broken
Site structure25 pages crawled · 246.8 internal links per page · reachable in: contact 1 click, about 1 click, team 1 click, services 1 click · 0% of links use a generic anchor
Sitemapdeclared in robots.txt

Winkworth Bath’s lowest-scoring pillars among those we publish remediation guidance for:


How this is measured: see the index methodology, and the statistical methods behind each pillar. This index is published by PYC; if you want this score moved, start here.