Skip to content

Strattons and Partners — Bath Estate Agent Digital Visibility Score

Digital Visibility Score: 63 / 100 · Rank 4 of 15

Measured 3 October 2026 via the PYC Bath Estate Agent Digital Visibility Index. Every figure is objective and reproducible from the methodology. Spotted an error? Request a correction.

Each pillar scored 0–100 against the sector median for this index. The final column is this firm's distance from that median.
PillarScoreMedianvs median
Speed & CWV7762+15
Technical6388−25
Local presence8885+3
Visibility2714+13
AI search presence2020level
Content & trust10080+20
Pillar performance against the sector median. Bars right of centre are above the median, left are below.
Speed & CWV+15
Technical-25
Local presence+3
Visibility+13
AI search presence0
Content & trust+20
These are specific, checkable faults on the site — not opinions about it.
  • Worth fixingNo XML sitemap foundSearch engines have to discover every page by following links. On a small site that is survivable; on a large one it is not.
  • Worth fixingNo structured data on the homepageNothing tells a search engine or an assistant what this business is, where it is, or what it does — in machine-readable terms.
Ranks for 2 of 12 keywords, average position 5.5, in the local 3-pack for 1 keyword.
KeywordPosition
estate agents Bathnot in top 100
best estate agents Bath#4
top estate agents Bath#7
letting agents Bathnot in top 100
sell my house Bathnot in top 100
house valuation Bathnot in top 100
property for sale Bathnot in top 100
estate agent fees Bathnot in top 100
rental properties Bathnot in top 100
estate agents Widcombenot in top 100
estate agents Lansdownnot in top 100
letting agents Widcombenot in top 100
This firm against the sector median and the index leader, Martin & Co Bath, on every pillar.
Speed & CWV77
Technical63
Local presence88
Visibility27
AI search presence20
Content & trust100

this firm sector median leader

Strattons and Partners trails Martin & Co Bath by 88 points across 3 pillars, but 88% of that is AI search presence and Technical alone. It already matches or beats the leader on Speed & CWV, Visibility, Content & trust.

Named in 1 of 5 AI answers. A domain citation is stronger evidence than a name mention.
✗Who are the best estate agents in Bath?
✓Which estate agent in Bath would you recommend for selling a house?cited by domain
✗Top rated letting agents in Bath
✗I am looking for an estate agent in Bath - who should I contact?
✗Best estate agents in Widcombe, Bath
Google Business Profile.
Rating5 / 5
Reviews279
Locations1
Reviews in last 90 days8
Address matches websiteyes
Largest Contentful Paint measured two ways: one throttled lab run, against 28 days of real Chrome users.
Lab (Lighthouse, mobile)17.5sone throttled load on a datacentre machine
Field (real users)1.0s75th percentile of actual Chrome visitors over 28 days

The lab figure is 18.3× the real-user figure. Both agree the site is performing acceptably for real visitors.

Themes Google extracted from this business’s reviews, by how often customers raise them. Not scored — this is what people say, not how findable the business is.
  • helpful staff110
  • supportive staff39
  • sale process17
  • first house purchase16
  • solicitor recommendation15
  • quick responses13
  • valuation8
  • issue resolution8
  • viewings8
  • regular updates7
What each score is made of. Every input here is in the open dataset, so the arithmetic can be checked rather than taken on trust.
PillarScoreMade up of
Content & trust100about page: yes · people introduced: yes · credentials: yes · blog or news: yes · homepage: 803 words
Visibility27ranks for 2 of 12 keywords · average position 5.5 · local 3-pack: 1
Local presence88279 reviews · rated 5 · 8 new in 90 days
Technical63HTTPS: yes · page allows indexing: yes · robots.txt allows crawling: yes · sitemap: no · structured data: no
  • Technical: 63/100, below the sector median of 88.

Martin & Co Bath leads the index with 73/100. The largest gaps are: AI search presence (20 vs 60); Technical (63 vs 100); Local presence (88 vs 99).

  1. Publish structured, citable content and entity schema so AI engines surface the business for core local queries.
  2. Build local landing pages for the core keyword basket to lift organic and local-pack appearance.
  3. Add valid LocalBusiness/RealEstateAgent schema, fix indexability, and ensure a fresh XML sitemap is referenced in robots.txt.
The firms nearest Strattons and Partners in this ranking, beyond the two either side.
FirmRankScoreWhy it is here
Winkworth Bath#267/1002 places above you
Allen & Harris Bath#660/1002 places below you
Martin & Co Bath#173/1003 places above you
Bath Stone Property#760/1003 places below you
Recorded alongside the measurement to make it easier to judge, but carrying no weight in the Digital Visibility Score. See the methodology.
Companies HouseNo confident match on the registered name
Real-user speed (CrUX)LCP 956ms · INP 87ms · CLS 0 · passes Core Web Vitals
Lighthouse (lab, mobile)Performance 59 · accessibility 69 · best practices 92 · SEO 92 — biggest losses: Minify CSS; LCP request discovery; Legacy JavaScript
Google profile detail8 photos · claimed · no description · hours listed · 0 of 279 reviews are one star
Backlinks310 referring domains · 1874 links · rank 188
Site structure25 pages crawled · 47.5 internal links per page · reachable in: contact 1 click, about 1 click · 4% of links use a generic anchor
Sitemapnot declared in robots.txt

Strattons and Partners’s lowest-scoring pillars among those we publish remediation guidance for:


How this is measured: see the index methodology, and the statistical methods behind each pillar. This index is published by PYC; if you want this score moved, start here.