Skip to content

Fine & Country Bath — Bath Estate Agent Digital Visibility Score

Digital Visibility Score: 48 / 100 · Rank 15 of 15

Measured 3 October 2026 via the PYC Bath Estate Agent Digital Visibility Index. Every figure is objective and reproducible from the methodology. Spotted an error? Request a correction.

Each pillar scored 0–100 against the sector median for this index. The final column is this firm's distance from that median.
PillarScoreMedianvs median
Speed & CWV—62not measured
Technical7588−13
Local presence7785−8
Visibility814−6
AI search presence2020level
Content & trust3580−45
Pillar performance against the sector median. Bars right of centre are above the median, left are below.
Speed & CWVnot measured
Technical-13
Local presence-8
Visibility-6
AI search presence0
Content & trust-45
1 critical problem found. These are specific, checkable faults on the site — not opinions about it.
  • CriticalSearch engines are being told not to index this siteThe site’s own robots.txt disallows crawling. Until that changes, nothing else on this page can help — the pages cannot enter the index in the first place.
  • Worth fixingStructured data present, but no LocalBusiness markupThe page describes something to machines, but not that it is a local business with an address and opening hours.
Ranks for 2 of 12 keywords, average position 19, in the local 3-pack for 0 keywords.
KeywordPosition
estate agents Bathnot in top 100
best estate agents Bath#26
top estate agents Bath#12
letting agents Bathnot in top 100
sell my house Bathnot in top 100
house valuation Bathnot in top 100
property for sale Bathnot in top 100
estate agent fees Bathnot in top 100
rental properties Bathnot in top 100
estate agents Widcombenot in top 100
estate agents Lansdownnot in top 100
letting agents Widcombenot in top 100
This firm against the sector median and the index leader, Martin & Co Bath, on every pillar.
Technical75
Local presence77
Visibility8
AI search presence20
Content & trust35

this firm sector median leader

Fine & Country Bath trails Martin & Co Bath by 157 points across 5 pillars, but 67% of that is Content & trust and AI search presence alone.

Ranked between #11 and #20 — one page from the first, ordered by how close.
top estate agents Bath#12

1 position sits between #11 and #20 — one page away, and the cheapest ranking work available to this firm.

Named in 1 of 5 AI answers. A domain citation is stronger evidence than a name mention.
✗Who are the best estate agents in Bath?
✓Which estate agent in Bath would you recommend for selling a house?named
✗Top rated letting agents in Bath
✗I am looking for an estate agent in Bath - who should I contact?
✗Best estate agents in Widcombe, Bath
Google Business Profile.
Rating4.9 / 5
Reviews77
Locations1
Reviews in last 90 days6
Address matches websiteno
Largest Contentful Paint measured two ways: one throttled lab run, against 28 days of real Chrome users.
Lab (Lighthouse, mobile)6.8sone throttled load on a datacentre machine
Field (real users)3.2s75th percentile of actual Chrome visitors over 28 days

The lab figure is 2.1× the real-user figure. Both agree there is a problem, and the field data confirms real visitors are affected. This is worth fixing. The metric failing for real users is loading (LCP) and responsiveness (INP).

What each score is made of. Every input here is in the open dataset, so the arithmetic can be checked rather than taken on trust.
PillarScoreMade up of
Content & trust35about page: no · people introduced: yes · credentials: no · blog or news: no · homepage: 551 words
Visibility8ranks for 2 of 12 keywords · average position 19 · local 3-pack: 0
Local presence7777 reviews · rated 4.9 · 6 new in 90 days
Technical75HTTPS: yes · page allows indexing: yes · robots.txt allows crawling: no · sitemap: yes · structured data: yes
  • Technical: 75/100, below the sector median of 88.
  • Content & trust: 35/100, below the sector median of 80.

Martin & Co Bath leads the index with 73/100. The largest gaps are: Content & trust (35 vs 100); AI search presence (20 vs 60); Technical (75 vs 100).

  1. Build local landing pages for the core keyword basket to lift organic and local-pack appearance.
  2. Publish structured, citable content and entity schema so AI engines surface the business for core local queries.
  3. Introduce the people who do the work, on an about or team page and the credentials that matter in this sector (Propertymark, NAEA, The Property Ombudsman), and refresh stale content.
The firms nearest Fine & Country Bath in this ranking, beyond the two either side.
FirmRankScoreWhy it is here
Justin Hunter#1349/1002 places above you
Crisp Cowley#1253/1003 places above you
Whiteley Helyar#1158/1004 places above you
Aspire To Move#1058/1005 places above you
Recorded alongside the measurement to make it easier to judge, but carrying no weight in the Digital Visibility Score. See the methodology.
Companies HouseNo confident match on the registered name
Real-user speed (CrUX)LCP 3224ms · INP 237ms · CLS 0.04 · does not pass Core Web Vitals
Lighthouse (lab, mobile)Performance 32 · accessibility 82 · best practices 96 · SEO 85 — biggest losses: Network dependency tree; Reduce JavaScript execution time; Reduce unused CSS
Backlinks2008 referring domains · 24402 links · rank 363 · 13363 broken
Site structure19 pages crawled · 55.3 internal links per page · reachable in: contact 1 click, about 2 clicks, team 1 click, services 2 clicks · 2% of links use a generic anchor
Sitemap4 URLs listed · not declared in robots.txt · newest entry 345 days old · 4 of 4 sampled URLs resolve

Fine & Country Bath’s lowest-scoring pillars among those we publish remediation guidance for:


How this is measured: see the index methodology, and the statistical methods behind each pillar. This index is published by PYC; if you want this score moved, start here.