Skip to content

Nash & Co — Bath Estate Agent Digital Visibility Score

Digital Visibility Score: 49 / 100 · Rank 14 of 15

Measured 3 October 2026 via the PYC Bath Estate Agent Digital Visibility Index. Every figure is objective and reproducible from the methodology. Spotted an error? Request a correction.

Each pillar scored 0–100 against the sector median for this index. The final column is this firm's distance from that median.
PillarScoreMedianvs median
Speed & CWV—62not measured
Technical7588−13
Local presence8485−1
Visibility1814+4
AI search presence020−20
Content & trust4680−34
Pillar performance against the sector median. Bars right of centre are above the median, left are below.
Speed & CWVnot measured
Technical-13
Local presence-1
Visibility+4
AI search presence-20
Content & trust-34
These are specific, checkable faults on the site — not opinions about it.
  • Worth fixingNo structured data on the homepageNothing tells a search engine or an assistant what this business is, where it is, or what it does — in machine-readable terms.
Ranks for 3 of 12 keywords, average position 17, in the local 3-pack for 3 keywords.
KeywordPosition
estate agents Bathnot in top 100
best estate agents Bath#14
top estate agents Bath#19
letting agents Bathnot in top 100
sell my house Bathnot in top 100
house valuation Bathnot in top 100
property for sale Bathnot in top 100
estate agent fees Bathnot in top 100
rental properties Bathnot in top 100
estate agents Widcombenot in top 100
estate agents Lansdown#18
letting agents Widcombenot in top 100
This firm against the sector median and the index leader, Martin & Co Bath, on every pillar.
Technical75
Local presence84
Visibility18
AI search presence0
Content & trust46

this firm sector median leader

Nash & Co trails Martin & Co Bath by 154 points across 4 pillars, but 74% of that is AI search presence and Content & trust alone. It already matches or beats the leader on Visibility.

Ranked between #11 and #20 — one page from the first, ordered by how close.
best estate agents Bath#14
estate agents Lansdown#18
top estate agents Bath#19

3 positions sit between #11 and #20 — one page away, and the cheapest ranking work available to this firm.

Named in 0 of 5 AI answers. A domain citation is stronger evidence than a name mention.
✗Who are the best estate agents in Bath?
✗Which estate agent in Bath would you recommend for selling a house?
✗Top rated letting agents in Bath
✗I am looking for an estate agent in Bath - who should I contact?
✗Best estate agents in Widcombe, Bath
Google Business Profile.
Rating4.9 / 5
Reviews162
Locations1
Reviews in last 90 days3
Address matches websiteyes
What each score is made of. Every input here is in the open dataset, so the arithmetic can be checked rather than taken on trust.
PillarScoreMade up of
Content & trust46about page: yes · people introduced: no · credentials: no · blog or news: no · homepage: 799 words · last changed: 0 days ago
Visibility18ranks for 3 of 12 keywords · average position 17 · local 3-pack: 3
Local presence84162 reviews · rated 4.9 · 3 new in 90 days
Technical75HTTPS: yes · page allows indexing: yes · robots.txt allows crawling: yes · sitemap: yes · structured data: no
  • Technical: 75/100, below the sector median of 88.
  • AI search presence: 0/100, below the sector median of 20.
  • Content & trust: 46/100, below the sector median of 80.

Martin & Co Bath leads the index with 73/100. The largest gaps are: AI search presence (0 vs 60); Content & trust (46 vs 100); Technical (75 vs 100).

  1. Publish structured, citable content and entity schema so AI engines surface the business for core local queries.
  2. Build local landing pages for the core keyword basket to lift organic and local-pack appearance.
  3. Introduce the people who do the work, on an about or team page and the credentials that matter in this sector (Propertymark, NAEA, The Property Ombudsman), and refresh stale content.
The firms nearest Nash & Co in this ranking, beyond the two either side.
FirmRankScoreWhy it is here
Crisp Cowley#1253/1002 places above you
Whiteley Helyar#1158/1003 places above you
Aspire To Move#1058/1004 places above you
Savills Bath#959/1005 places above you
Recorded alongside the measurement to make it easier to judge, but carrying no weight in the Digital Visibility Score. See the methodology.
Companies HouseNo confident match on the registered name
Real-user speed (CrUX)Too little traffic to appear in Chrome’s public dataset
Lighthouse (lab, mobile)Performance 61 · accessibility 80 · best practices 70 · SEO 83 — biggest losses: Reduce unused CSS; Image elements do not have `[alt]` attributes; Document request latency
Backlinks110 referring domains · 532 links · rank 148
Site structure1 pages crawled · 44 internal links per page · reachable in: contact 1 click, about 1 click · 9% of links use a generic anchor · 75 sitemap pages not reachable by following links
Sitemap76 URLs listed · not declared in robots.txt · no lastmod dates · 5 of 5 sampled URLs resolve

Nash & Co’s lowest-scoring pillars among those we publish remediation guidance for:


How this is measured: see the index methodology, and the statistical methods behind each pillar. This index is published by PYC; if you want this score moved, start here.