Skip to content

Justin Hunter — Bath Estate Agent Digital Visibility Score

Digital Visibility Score: 49 / 100 · Rank 13 of 15

Measured 3 October 2026 via the PYC Bath Estate Agent Digital Visibility Index. Every figure is objective and reproducible from the methodology. Spotted an error? Request a correction.

Each pillar scored 0–100 against the sector median for this index. The final column is this firm's distance from that median.
PillarScoreMedianvs median
Speed & CWV5362−9
Technical6388−25
Local presence8585level
Visibility2214+8
AI search presence020−20
Content & trust5580−25
Pillar performance against the sector median. Bars right of centre are above the median, left are below.
Speed & CWV-9
Technical-25
Local presence0
Visibility+8
AI search presence-20
Content & trust-25
These are specific, checkable faults on the site — not opinions about it.
  • Worth fixingNo XML sitemap foundSearch engines have to discover every page by following links. On a small site that is survivable; on a large one it is not.
  • Worth fixingNo structured data on the homepageNothing tells a search engine or an assistant what this business is, where it is, or what it does — in machine-readable terms.
Ranks for 4 of 12 keywords, average position 15.5, in the local 3-pack for 3 keywords.
KeywordPosition
estate agents Bathnot in top 100
best estate agents Bath#15
top estate agents Bath#10
letting agents Bathnot in top 100
sell my house Bathnot in top 100
house valuation Bathnot in top 100
property for sale Bathnot in top 100
estate agent fees Bath#8
rental properties Bathnot in top 100
estate agents Widcombenot in top 100
estate agents Lansdown#29
letting agents Widcombenot in top 100
This firm against the sector median and the index leader, Martin & Co Bath, on every pillar.
Speed & CWV53
Technical63
Local presence85
Visibility22
AI search presence0
Content & trust55

this firm sector median leader

Justin Hunter trails Martin & Co Bath by 165 points across 5 pillars, but 64% of that is AI search presence and Content & trust alone. It already matches or beats the leader on Visibility.

Ranked between #11 and #20 — one page from the first, ordered by how close.
best estate agents Bath#15

1 position sits between #11 and #20 — one page away, and the cheapest ranking work available to this firm.

Named in 0 of 5 AI answers. A domain citation is stronger evidence than a name mention.
✗Who are the best estate agents in Bath?
✗Which estate agent in Bath would you recommend for selling a house?
✗Top rated letting agents in Bath
✗I am looking for an estate agent in Bath - who should I contact?
✗Best estate agents in Widcombe, Bath
Google Business Profile.
Rating5 / 5
Reviews157
Locations1
Reviews in last 90 days4
Address matches websiteyes
Themes Google extracted from this business’s reviews, by how often customers raise them. Not scored — this is what people say, not how findable the business is.
  • selling a house29
  • buying a house15
  • easy to contact6
  • honest advice5
  • responsive staff5
  • viewings5
  • informative staff4
  • honest staff4
  • down to earth team3
  • communication with sellers2
What each score is made of. Every input here is in the open dataset, so the arithmetic can be checked rather than taken on trust.
PillarScoreMade up of
Content & trust55about page: yes · people introduced: no · credentials: yes · blog or news: no · homepage: 724 words
Visibility22ranks for 4 of 12 keywords · average position 15.5 · local 3-pack: 3
Local presence85157 reviews · rated 5 · 4 new in 90 days
Technical63HTTPS: yes · page allows indexing: yes · robots.txt allows crawling: yes · sitemap: no · structured data: no
  • Technical: 63/100, below the sector median of 88.
  • AI search presence: 0/100, below the sector median of 20.
  • Content & trust: 55/100, below the sector median of 80.

Martin & Co Bath leads the index with 73/100. The largest gaps are: AI search presence (0 vs 60); Content & trust (55 vs 100); Technical (63 vs 100).

  1. Publish structured, citable content and entity schema so AI engines surface the business for core local queries.
  2. Build local landing pages for the core keyword basket to lift organic and local-pack appearance.
  3. Cut mobile LCP below 2.5s (optimise images and remove render-blocking resources) — the biggest score and ranking lever.
The firms nearest Justin Hunter in this ranking, beyond the two either side.
FirmRankScoreWhy it is here
Whiteley Helyar#1158/1002 places above you
Fine & Country Bath#1548/1002 places below you
Aspire To Move#1058/1003 places above you
Savills Bath#959/1004 places above you
Recorded alongside the measurement to make it easier to judge, but carrying no weight in the Digital Visibility Score. See the methodology.
Companies HouseNo confident match on the registered name
Real-user speed (CrUX)Too little traffic to appear in Chrome’s public dataset
Lighthouse (lab, mobile)Performance 40 · accessibility 69 · best practices 88 · SEO 83 — biggest losses: Render-blocking requests; Links rely on color to be distinguishable.; LCP request discovery
Google profile detail3 photos · claimed · has a description · hours listed · 0 of 157 reviews are one star
Backlinks77 referring domains · 787 links · rank 165
Site structure25 pages crawled · 36.6 internal links per page · reachable in: contact 1 click, about 1 click · 4% of links use a generic anchor
Sitemapnot declared in robots.txt

Justin Hunter’s lowest-scoring pillars among those we publish remediation guidance for:


How this is measured: see the index methodology, and the statistical methods behind each pillar. This index is published by PYC; if you want this score moved, start here.