Skip to content

Boardwalk Property — Bristol Estate Agent Digital Visibility Score

Digital Visibility Score: 57 / 100 · Rank 10 of 18

Measured 3 October 2026 via the PYC Bristol Estate Agent Digital Visibility Index. Every figure is objective and reproducible from the methodology. Spotted an error? Request a correction.

Each pillar scored 0–100 against the sector median for this index. The final column is this firm's distance from that median.
PillarScoreMedianvs median
Speed & CWV8870+18
Technical7588−13
Local presence8083.5−3.5
Visibility1313level
AI search presence00level
Content & trust6762+5
Pillar performance against the sector median. Bars right of centre are above the median, left are below.
Speed & CWV+18
Technical-13
Local presence-3.5
Visibility0
AI search presence0
Content & trust+5
These are specific, checkable faults on the site — not opinions about it.
  • Worth fixingNo structured data on the homepageNothing tells a search engine or an assistant what this business is, where it is, or what it does — in machine-readable terms.
Ranks for 2 of 12 keywords, average position 13, in the local 3-pack for 3 keywords.
KeywordPosition
estate agents Bristolnot in top 100
best estate agents Bristol#1
top estate agents Bristolnot in top 100
letting agents Bristolnot in top 100
sell my house Bristolnot in top 100
house valuation Bristolnot in top 100
property for sale Bristolnot in top 100
estate agent fees Bristolnot in top 100
rental properties Bristolnot in top 100
estate agents Clifton#25
estate agents Redlandnot in top 100
letting agents Cliftonnot in top 100
This firm against the sector median and the index leader, CJ Hole, on every pillar.
Speed & CWV88
Technical75
Local presence80
Visibility13
AI search presence0
Content & trust67

this firm sector median leader

Boardwalk Property trails CJ Hole by 86 points across 4 pillars, but 76% of that is AI search presence and Technical alone. It already matches or beats the leader on Speed & CWV, Content & trust.

Named in 0 of 5 AI answers. A domain citation is stronger evidence than a name mention.
✗Who are the best estate agents in Bristol?
✗Which estate agent in Bristol would you recommend for selling a house?
✗Top rated letting agents in Bristol
✗I am looking for an estate agent in Bristol - who should I contact?
✗Best estate agents in Clifton, Bristol
Google Business Profile.
Rating4.89 / 5
Reviews1015
Locations4
Reviews in last 90 days0
Address matches websiteyes
Largest Contentful Paint measured two ways: one throttled lab run, against 28 days of real Chrome users.
Lab (Lighthouse, mobile)3.1sone throttled load on a datacentre machine
Field (real users)5.3s75th percentile of actual Chrome visitors over 28 days

The lab figure is 0.6× the real-user figure. The lab test looks acceptable while real visitors are failing Core Web Vitals. This is the more serious direction of disagreement: the problem is real and a one-off lab run is missing it. The metric failing for real users is loading (LCP).

What each score is made of. Every input here is in the open dataset, so the arithmetic can be checked rather than taken on trust.
PillarScoreMade up of
Content & trust67about page: yes · people introduced: no · credentials: no · blog or news: yes · homepage: 1,997 words · last changed: 0 days ago
Visibility13ranks for 2 of 12 keywords · average position 13 · local 3-pack: 3
Local presence801015 reviews · rated 4.89 · 0 new in 90 days
Technical75HTTPS: yes · page allows indexing: yes · robots.txt allows crawling: yes · sitemap: yes · structured data: no
  • Technical: 75/100, below the sector median of 88.

CJ Hole leads the index with 67/100. The largest gaps are: AI search presence (0 vs 40); Technical (75 vs 100); Visibility (13 vs 31).

  1. Publish structured, citable content and entity schema so AI engines surface the business for core local queries.
  2. Build local landing pages for the core keyword basket to lift organic and local-pack appearance.
  3. Introduce the people who do the work, on an about or team page and the credentials that matter in this sector (Propertymark, NAEA, The Property Ombudsman), and refresh stale content.
The firms nearest Boardwalk Property in this ranking, beyond the two either side.
FirmRankScoreWhy it is here
Allen & Harris#858/1002 places above you
Maggs & Allen#1256/1002 places below you
Knight Frank Bristol#759/1003 places above you
Besley Hill#1351/1003 places below you
Recorded alongside the measurement to make it easier to judge, but carrying no weight in the Digital Visibility Score. See the methodology.
Companies HouseCompany 08795972 · 12.8 years old · active · SIC 68310
Real-user speed (CrUX)LCP 5254ms · INP 77ms · CLS 0 · does not pass Core Web Vitals
Lighthouse (lab, mobile)Performance 79 · accessibility 89 · best practices 96 · SEO 92 — biggest losses: Minimize main-thread work; LCP request discovery; Reduce unused JavaScript
Backlinks717 referring domains · 3195 links · rank 320 · 2263 broken
Site structure10 pages crawled · 38.3 internal links per page · reachable in: contact 1 click, about 1 click · 2% of links use a generic anchor
Sitemap27 URLs listed · declared in robots.txt · newest entry 45 days old · 5 of 5 sampled URLs resolve

Boardwalk Property’s lowest-scoring pillars among those we publish remediation guidance for:


How this is measured: see the index methodology, and the statistical methods behind each pillar. This index is published by PYC; if you want this score moved, start here.