Digital Visibility Score: 73 / 100 · Rank 1 of 15
Measured 3 October 2026 via the PYC Bath Estate Agent Digital Visibility Index. Every figure is objective and reproducible from the methodology . Spotted an error? Request a correction .
Each pillar scored 0–100 against the sector median for this index. The final column is this firm's distance from that median.
Pillar performance against the sector median. Bars right of centre are above the median, left are below.
Speed & CWV 0 Technical +12 Local presence +14 Visibility -1 AI search presence +40 Content & trust +20
Ranks for 3 of 12 keywords, average position 17, in the local 3-pack for 0 keywords.
Keyword Position estate agents Bath not in top 100 best estate agents Bath #20 top estate agents Bath #16 letting agents Bath not in top 100 sell my house Bath not in top 100 house valuation Bath not in top 100 property for sale Bath not in top 100 estate agent fees Bath #15 rental properties Bath not in top 100 estate agents Widcombe not in top 100 estate agents Lansdown not in top 100 letting agents Widcombe not in top 100
Ranked between #11 and #20 — one page from the first, ordered by how close.
#15 #16 #20
3 positions sit between #11 and #20 — one page away, and the cheapest ranking work available to this firm.
Named in 3 of 5 AI answers. A domain citation is stronger evidence than a name mention.
✗ Who are the best estate agents in Bath? ✓ Which estate agent in Bath would you recommend for selling a house? cited by domain ✓ Top rated letting agents in Bath named ✓ I am looking for an estate agent in Bath - who should I contact? cited by domain ✗ Best estate agents in Widcombe, Bath
Google Business Profile.
Rating 4.7 / 5 Reviews 254 Locations 1 Reviews in last 90 days 15 Address matches website yes
Largest Contentful Paint measured two ways: one throttled lab run, against 28 days of real Chrome users.
Lab (Lighthouse, mobile) 24.7s one throttled load on a datacentre machine Field (real users) 1.6s 75th percentile of actual Chrome visitors over 28 days
The lab figure is 15.2× the real-user figure. The lab test rates this site poorly, but real visitors are not experiencing it that way — Core Web Vitals pass on field data. Treat a low lab score here as a lead to investigate, not a fault to pay to fix.
Themes Google extracted from this business’s reviews, by how often customers raise them. Not scored — this is what people say, not how findable the business is.
helpful staff 105 tenancy 25 quick responses 24 accommodating staff 19 informative staff 13 efficient team 13 letting agents 12 property viewing 8 moving in process 4 feeling of security 2
What each score is made of. Every input here is in the open dataset , so the arithmetic can be checked rather than taken on trust.
Pillar Score Made up of Content & trust 100 about page: yes · people introduced: yes · credentials: yes · blog or news: yes · homepage: 1,345 words · last changed: 48 days ago Visibility 13 ranks for 3 of 12 keywords · average position 17 · local 3-pack: 0 Local presence 99 254 reviews · rated 4.7 · 15 new in 90 days Technical 100 HTTPS: yes · page allows indexing: yes · robots.txt allows crawling: yes · sitemap: yes · structured data: yes
No pillar falls materially below the sector median this quarter.
Build local landing pages for the core keyword basket to lift organic and local-pack appearance.
Publish structured, citable content and entity schema so AI engines surface the business for core local queries.
Cut mobile LCP below 2.5s (optimise images and remove render-blocking resources) — the biggest score and ranking lever.
The firms nearest Martin & Co Bath in this ranking, beyond the two either side.
Recorded alongside the measurement to make it easier to judge, but carrying no weight in the Digital Visibility Score. See the methodology .
Companies House No confident match on the registered name Real-user speed (CrUX) LCP 1621ms · INP 163ms · CLS 0.03 · passes Core Web Vitals Lighthouse (lab, mobile) Performance 41 · accessibility 93 · best practices 73 · SEO 100 — biggest losses: Reduce unused JavaScript; Render-blocking requests; Reduce unused CSS Google profile detail 23 photos · claimed · has a description · hours listed · 16 of 254 reviews are one star Backlinks 1783 referring domains · 61963 links · rank 430 · 34626 broken Site structure 25 pages crawled · 149.6 internal links per page · reachable in: contact 1 click, about 1 click, team 2 clicks · 1% of links use a generic anchor Sitemap 1000 URLs listed · declared in robots.txt · newest entry 2 days old · 5 of 5 sampled URLs resolve
Martin & Co Bath’s lowest-scoring pillars among those we publish remediation guidance for:
How this is measured: see the index methodology , and the statistical methods behind each pillar. This index is published by PYC ; if you want this score moved, start here .