Skip to content

Aspire To Move — Bath Estate Agent Digital Visibility Score

Digital Visibility Score: 58 / 100 · Rank 10 of 15

Measured 3 October 2026 via the PYC Bath Estate Agent Digital Visibility Index. Every figure is objective and reproducible from the methodology. Spotted an error? Request a correction.

Each pillar scored 0–100 against the sector median for this index. The final column is this firm's distance from that median.
PillarScoreMedianvs median
Speed & CWV5762−5
Technical7588−13
Local presence10085+15
Visibility1214−2
AI search presence020−20
Content & trust10080+20
Pillar performance against the sector median. Bars right of centre are above the median, left are below.
Speed & CWV-5
Technical-13
Local presence+15
Visibility-2
AI search presence-20
Content & trust+20
These are specific, checkable faults on the site — not opinions about it.
  • Worth fixingNo structured data on the homepageNothing tells a search engine or an assistant what this business is, where it is, or what it does — in machine-readable terms.
Ranks for 2 of 12 keywords, average position 37, in the local 3-pack for 2 keywords.
KeywordPosition
estate agents Bath#28
best estate agents Bathnot in top 100
top estate agents Bath#46
letting agents Bathnot in top 100
sell my house Bathnot in top 100
house valuation Bathnot in top 100
property for sale Bathnot in top 100
estate agent fees Bathnot in top 100
rental properties Bathnot in top 100
estate agents Widcombenot in top 100
estate agents Lansdownnot in top 100
letting agents Widcombenot in top 100
This firm against the sector median and the index leader, Martin & Co Bath, on every pillar.
Speed & CWV57
Technical75
Local presence100
Visibility12
AI search presence0
Content & trust100

this firm sector median leader

Aspire To Move trails Martin & Co Bath by 91 points across 4 pillars, but 93% of that is AI search presence and Technical alone. It already matches or beats the leader on Local presence, Content & trust.

Named in 0 of 5 AI answers. A domain citation is stronger evidence than a name mention.
✗Who are the best estate agents in Bath?
✗Which estate agent in Bath would you recommend for selling a house?
✗Top rated letting agents in Bath
✗I am looking for an estate agent in Bath - who should I contact?
✗Best estate agents in Widcombe, Bath
Google Business Profile.
Rating5 / 5
Reviews430
Locations1
Reviews in last 90 days20
Address matches websiteyes
What each score is made of. Every input here is in the open dataset, so the arithmetic can be checked rather than taken on trust.
PillarScoreMade up of
Content & trust100about page: yes · people introduced: yes, on the about page · credentials: yes · blog or news: yes · homepage: 1,796 words
Visibility12ranks for 2 of 12 keywords · average position 37 · local 3-pack: 2
Local presence100430 reviews · rated 5 · 20 new in 90 days
Technical75HTTPS: yes · page allows indexing: yes · robots.txt allows crawling: yes · sitemap: yes · structured data: no
  • Technical: 75/100, below the sector median of 88.
  • AI search presence: 0/100, below the sector median of 20.

Martin & Co Bath leads the index with 73/100. The largest gaps are: AI search presence (0 vs 60); Technical (75 vs 100).

  1. Publish structured, citable content and entity schema so AI engines surface the business for core local queries.
  2. Build local landing pages for the core keyword basket to lift organic and local-pack appearance.
  3. Cut mobile LCP below 2.5s (optimise images and remove render-blocking resources) — the biggest score and ranking lever.
The firms nearest Aspire To Move in this ranking, beyond the two either side.
FirmRankScoreWhy it is here
Cobb Farr#859/1002 places above you
Crisp Cowley#1253/1002 places below you
Bath Stone Property#760/1003 places above you
Justin Hunter#1349/1003 places below you
Recorded alongside the measurement to make it easier to judge, but carrying no weight in the Digital Visibility Score. See the methodology.
Companies HouseCompany 12248993 · 7 years old · active · SIC 68310
Real-user speed (CrUX)Too little traffic to appear in Chrome’s public dataset
Lighthouse (lab, mobile)Performance 55 · accessibility 84 · best practices 73 · SEO 92 — biggest losses: Issues were logged in the `Issues` panel in Chrome Devtools; Minimize main-thread work; Document does not have a main landmark.
Backlinks75 referring domains · 1629 links · rank 115
Site structure23 pages crawled · 63.6 internal links per page · reachable in: contact 1 click, about 1 click, team 2 clicks, services 1 click · 3% of links use a generic anchor
Sitemap90 URLs listed · declared in robots.txt · newest entry 38 days old · 5 of 5 sampled URLs resolve

Aspire To Move’s lowest-scoring pillars among those we publish remediation guidance for:


How this is measured: see the index methodology, and the statistical methods behind each pillar. This index is published by PYC; if you want this score moved, start here.