Skip to content

CJ Hole — Bristol Estate Agent Digital Visibility Score

Digital Visibility Score: 67 / 100 · Rank 1 of 18

Measured 3 October 2026 via the PYC Bristol Estate Agent Digital Visibility Index. Every figure is objective and reproducible from the methodology. Spotted an error? Request a correction.

Each pillar scored 0–100 against the sector median for this index. The final column is this firm's distance from that median.
PillarScoreMedianvs median
Speed & CWV7270+2
Technical10088+12
Local presence8383.5−0.5
Visibility3113+18
AI search presence400+40
Content & trust4962−13
Pillar performance against the sector median. Bars right of centre are above the median, left are below.
Speed & CWV+2
Technical+12
Local presence-0.5
Visibility+18
AI search presence+40
Content & trust-13
These are specific, checkable faults on the site — not opinions about it.
  • Worth knowingThe site has not changed in a long timeThe homepage last reported a change 2.5 years ago.
Ranks for 5 of 12 keywords, average position 15, in the local 3-pack for 6 keywords.
KeywordPosition
estate agents Bristolnot in top 100
best estate agents Bristol#27
top estate agents Bristolnot in top 100
letting agents Bristolnot in top 100
sell my house Bristolnot in top 100
house valuation Bristolnot in top 100
property for sale Bristolnot in top 100
estate agent fees Bristol#25
rental properties Bristol#5
estate agents Clifton#13
estate agents Redlandnot in top 100
letting agents Clifton#5
Ranked between #11 and #20 — one page from the first, ordered by how close.
estate agents Clifton#13

1 position sits between #11 and #20 — one page away, and the cheapest ranking work available to this firm.

Named in 2 of 5 AI answers. A domain citation is stronger evidence than a name mention.
✓Who are the best estate agents in Bristol?named
✗Which estate agent in Bristol would you recommend for selling a house?
✗Top rated letting agents in Bristol
✓I am looking for an estate agent in Bristol - who should I contact?cited by domain
✗Best estate agents in Clifton, Bristol
Google Business Profile.
Rating4.76 / 5
Reviews502
Locations3
Reviews in last 90 days4
Address matches websiteyes
Largest Contentful Paint measured two ways: one throttled lab run, against 28 days of real Chrome users.
Lab (Lighthouse, mobile)19.2sone throttled load on a datacentre machine
Field (real users)1.4s75th percentile of actual Chrome visitors over 28 days

The lab figure is 13.3× the real-user figure. The lab test rates this site poorly, but real visitors are not experiencing it that way — Core Web Vitals pass on field data. Treat a low lab score here as a lead to investigate, not a fault to pay to fix.

Themes Google extracted from this business’s reviews, by how often customers raise them. Not scored — this is what people say, not how findable the business is.
  • landlord support19
  • lettings team18
  • helpful team12
  • polite staff9
  • selling property9
  • liaising with solicitors7
  • maintenance issues5
  • finding tenants5
  • mortgage advisor2
  • proactive reporting2
What each score is made of. Every input here is in the open dataset, so the arithmetic can be checked rather than taken on trust.
PillarScoreMade up of
Content & trust49about page: no · people introduced: no · credentials: yes · blog or news: yes · homepage: 717 words · last changed: 909 days ago
Visibility31ranks for 5 of 12 keywords · average position 15 · local 3-pack: 6
Local presence83502 reviews · rated 4.76 · 4 new in 90 days
Technical100HTTPS: yes · page allows indexing: yes · robots.txt allows crawling: yes · sitemap: yes · structured data: yes
  • Content & trust: 49/100, below the sector median of 62.
  1. Build local landing pages for the core keyword basket to lift organic and local-pack appearance.
  2. Publish structured, citable content and entity schema so AI engines surface the business for core local queries.
  3. Introduce the people who do the work, on an about or team page and the credentials that matter in this sector (Propertymark, NAEA, The Property Ombudsman), and refresh stale content.
The firms nearest CJ Hole in this ranking, beyond the two either side.
FirmRankScoreWhy it is here
Chappell & Matthews#362/1002 places below you
Hollis Morgan#461/1003 places below you
Richard Harding#560/1004 places below you
Goodman & Lilley#659/1005 places below you
Recorded alongside the measurement to make it easier to judge, but carrying no weight in the Digital Visibility Score. See the methodology.
Companies HouseNo confident match on the registered name
Real-user speed (CrUX)LCP 1439ms · INP 175ms · CLS 0 · passes Core Web Vitals
Lighthouse (lab, mobile)Performance 41 · accessibility 89 · best practices 100 · SEO 92 — biggest losses: Reduce JavaScript execution time; Render-blocking requests; Reduce unused JavaScript
Google profile detail17 photos · claimed · has a description · hours listed · 20 of 239 reviews are one star
Backlinks540 referring domains · 16139 links · rank 378 · 6922 broken
Site structure25 pages crawled · 114.1 internal links per page · reachable in: contact 2 clicks, about 2 clicks, services 2 clicks · 1% of links use a generic anchor
Sitemap310 URLs listed · declared in robots.txt · newest entry 8 days old · 5 of 5 sampled URLs resolve

CJ Hole’s lowest-scoring pillars among those we publish remediation guidance for:


How this is measured: see the index methodology, and the statistical methods behind each pillar. This index is published by PYC; if you want this score moved, start here.