Skip to content

Richard Harding — Bristol Estate Agent Digital Visibility Score

Digital Visibility Score: 60 / 100 · Rank 5 of 18

Measured 3 October 2026 via the PYC Bristol Estate Agent Digital Visibility Index. Every figure is objective and reproducible from the methodology. Spotted an error? Request a correction.

Each pillar scored 0–100 against the sector median for this index. The final column is this firm's distance from that median.
PillarScoreMedianvs median
Speed & CWV6870−2
Technical8888level
Local presence8583.5+1.5
Visibility3313+20
AI search presence00level
Content & trust6662+4
Pillar performance against the sector median. Bars right of centre are above the median, left are below.
Speed & CWV-2
Technical0
Local presence+1.5
Visibility+20
AI search presence0
Content & trust+4
1 critical problem found. These are specific, checkable faults on the site — not opinions about it.
  • CriticalSearch engines are being told not to index this siteThe site’s own robots.txt disallows crawling. Until that changes, nothing else on this page can help — the pages cannot enter the index in the first place.
  • Worth knowingThe site has not changed in a long timeThe homepage last reported a change 5.6 years ago.
Ranks for 3 of 12 keywords, average position 5.3, in the local 3-pack for 2 keywords.
KeywordPosition
estate agents Bristolnot in top 100
best estate agents Bristolnot in top 100
top estate agents Bristolnot in top 100
letting agents Bristolnot in top 100
sell my house Bristolnot in top 100
house valuation Bristolnot in top 100
property for sale Bristolnot in top 100
estate agent fees Bristolnot in top 100
rental properties Bristolnot in top 100
estate agents Clifton#3
estate agents Redland#1
letting agents Clifton#12
This firm against the sector median and the index leader, CJ Hole, on every pillar.
Speed & CWV68
Technical88
Local presence85
Visibility33
AI search presence0
Content & trust66

this firm sector median leader

Richard Harding trails CJ Hole by 56 points across 3 pillars, but 93% of that is AI search presence and Technical alone. It already matches or beats the leader on Local presence, Visibility, Content & trust.

Ranked between #11 and #20 — one page from the first, ordered by how close.
letting agents Clifton#12

1 position sits between #11 and #20 — one page away, and the cheapest ranking work available to this firm.

Named in 0 of 5 AI answers. A domain citation is stronger evidence than a name mention.
✗Who are the best estate agents in Bristol?
✗Which estate agent in Bristol would you recommend for selling a house?
✗Top rated letting agents in Bristol
✗I am looking for an estate agent in Bristol - who should I contact?
✗Best estate agents in Clifton, Bristol
Google Business Profile.
Rating4.9 / 5
Reviews202
Locations1
Reviews in last 90 days5
Address matches websiteyes
Largest Contentful Paint measured two ways: one throttled lab run, against 28 days of real Chrome users.
Lab (Lighthouse, mobile)30.5sone throttled load on a datacentre machine
Field (real users)3.2s75th percentile of actual Chrome visitors over 28 days

The lab figure is 9.6× the real-user figure. The lab test looks acceptable while real visitors are failing Core Web Vitals. This is the more serious direction of disagreement: the problem is real and a one-off lab run is missing it. The metric failing for real users is loading (LCP).

What each score is made of. Every input here is in the open dataset, so the arithmetic can be checked rather than taken on trust.
PillarScoreMade up of
Content & trust66about page: yes · people introduced: yes · credentials: no · blog or news: yes · homepage: 547 words · last changed: 2032 days ago
Visibility33ranks for 3 of 12 keywords · average position 5.3 · local 3-pack: 2
Local presence85202 reviews · rated 4.9 · 5 new in 90 days
Technical88HTTPS: yes · page allows indexing: yes · robots.txt allows crawling: no · sitemap: yes · structured data: yes
  • No pillar falls materially below the sector median this quarter.

CJ Hole leads the index with 67/100. The largest gaps are: AI search presence (0 vs 40); Technical (88 vs 100).

  1. Publish structured, citable content and entity schema so AI engines surface the business for core local queries.
  2. Build local landing pages for the core keyword basket to lift organic and local-pack appearance.
  3. Introduce the people who do the work, on an about or team page and the credentials that matter in this sector (Propertymark, NAEA, The Property Ombudsman), and refresh stale content.
The firms nearest Richard Harding in this ranking, beyond the two either side.
FirmRankScoreWhy it is here
Chappell & Matthews#362/1002 places above you
Knight Frank Bristol#759/1002 places below you
Ocean Estate Agents#263/1003 places above you
Allen & Harris#858/1003 places below you
Recorded alongside the measurement to make it easier to judge, but carrying no weight in the Digital Visibility Score. See the methodology.
Companies HouseNo confident match on the registered name
Real-user speed (CrUX)LCP 3183ms · INP 81ms · CLS 0 · does not pass Core Web Vitals
Lighthouse (lab, mobile)Performance 61 · accessibility 82 · best practices 100 · SEO 77 — biggest losses: Links are not crawlable; Improve image delivery; Use efficient cache lifetimes
Backlinks132 referring domains · 1301 links · rank 216 · 1 broken
Site structure25 pages crawled · 102.8 internal links per page · reachable in: contact 1 click, about 1 click, team 1 click · 23% of links use a generic anchor
Sitemap24 URLs listed · declared in robots.txt · newest entry 3 days old · 5 of 5 sampled URLs resolve

Richard Harding’s lowest-scoring pillars among those we publish remediation guidance for:


How this is measured: see the index methodology, and the statistical methods behind each pillar. This index is published by PYC; if you want this score moved, start here.