Leese & Nagle — Bristol Estate Agent Digital Visibility Score

Digital Visibility Score: 44 / 100 · Rank 16 of 18

Digital Visibility Score44/100Rank 16 of 18Problems found2Very little published contentFurthest behind-40Speed & CWV: 30 against a sector median of 70

Measured 3 October 2026 via the PYC Bristol Estate Agent Digital Visibility Index. Every figure is objective and reproducible from the methodology. Spotted an error? Request a correction.

Pillar breakdown vs sector median

Each pillar scored 0–100 against the sector median for this index. The final column is this firm's distance from that median.

Pillar	Score	Median	vs median
Speed & CWV	30	70	−40
Technical	100	88	+12
Local presence	67	83.5	−16.5
Visibility	0	13	−13
AI search presence	0	0	level
Content & trust	45	62	−17

Pillar performance against the sector median. Bars right of centre are above the median, left are below.

Speed & CWV		-40
Technical		+12
Local presence		-16.5
Visibility		-13
AI search presence		0
Content & trust		-17

Problems found

These are specific, checkable faults on the site — not opinions about it.

• Worth fixingVery little published contentThe homepage carries 313 words and the site links to no blog, news or insights section. There is little here for a search engine to match, or for an assistant to quote.
• Worth knowingThe site has not changed in a long timeThe homepage last reported a change 3.5 years ago.

Where this firm ranks

Ranks for 0 of 12 keywords, in the local 3-pack for 0 keywords.

Keyword	Position
estate agents Bristol	not in top 100
best estate agents Bristol	not in top 100
top estate agents Bristol	not in top 100
letting agents Bristol	not in top 100
sell my house Bristol	not in top 100
house valuation Bristol	not in top 100
property for sale Bristol	not in top 100
estate agent fees Bristol	not in top 100
rental properties Bristol	not in top 100
estate agents Clifton	not in top 100
estate agents Redland	not in top 100
letting agents Clifton	not in top 100

The gap to the leader

This firm against the sector median and the index leader, CJ Hole, on every pillar.

Speed & CWV		30
Technical		100
Local presence		67
Visibility		0
AI search presence		0
Content & trust		45

this firm sector median leader

Leese & Nagle trails CJ Hole by 133 points across 5 pillars, but 62% of that is Speed & CWV and AI search presence alone. It already matches or beats the leader on Technical.

AI search presence

Named in 0 of 5 AI answers. A domain citation is stronger evidence than a name mention.

✗	Who are the best estate agents in Bristol?
✗	Which estate agent in Bristol would you recommend for selling a house?
✗	Top rated letting agents in Bristol
✗	I am looking for an estate agent in Bristol - who should I contact?
✗	Best estate agents in Clifton, Bristol

Local presence

Google Business Profile — matched on name and category; the profile lists a different website to the one indexed.

Rating	4.9 / 5
Reviews	50
Locations	1
Reviews in last 90 days	0
Address matches website	no

Why this score

What each score is made of. Every input here is in the open dataset, so the arithmetic can be checked rather than taken on trust.

Pillar	Score	Made up of
Content & trust	45	about page: yes · people introduced: yes · credentials: no · blog or news: no · homepage: 313 words · last changed: 1295 days ago
Visibility	0	ranks for 0 of 12 keywords · local 3-pack: 0
Local presence	67	50 reviews · rated 4.9 · 0 new in 90 days
Technical	100	HTTPS: yes · page allows indexing: yes · robots.txt allows crawling: yes · sitemap: yes · structured data: yes

Key findings

• Speed & CWV: 30/100, below the sector median of 70.
• Local presence: 67/100, below the sector median of 83.5.
• Visibility: 0/100, below the sector median of 13.
• Content & trust: 45/100, below the sector median of 62.

How this compares to the leader

CJ Hole leads the index with 67/100. The largest gaps are: Speed & CWV (30 vs 72); AI search presence (0 vs 40); Visibility (0 vs 31).

Top fixes (ranked by impact)

1. Build local landing pages for the core keyword basket to lift organic and local-pack appearance.
2. Publish structured, citable content and entity schema so AI engines surface the business for core local queries.
3. Cut mobile LCP below 2.5s (optimise images and remove render-blocking resources) — the biggest score and ranking lever.

Firms ranked near this one

The firms nearest Leese & Nagle in this ranking, beyond the two either side.

Firm	Rank	Score	Why it is here
Hydes of Bristol	#14	47/100	2 places above you
Saunders Estate Agents	#18	37/100	2 places below you
Besley Hill	#13	51/100	3 places above you
Maggs & Allen	#12	56/100	4 places above you

Context (not scored)

Recorded alongside the measurement to make it easier to judge, but carrying no weight in the Digital Visibility Score. See the methodology.

Companies House	No confident match on the registered name
Real-user speed (CrUX)	Too little traffic to appear in Chrome’s public dataset
Lighthouse (lab, mobile)	Performance 52 · accessibility 80 · best practices 96 · SEO 92 — biggest losses: Render-blocking requests; Links do not have a discernible name; Largest Contentful Paint
Backlinks	99 referring domains · 276 links · rank 133 · 3 broken
Site structure	1 pages crawled · 0 internal links per page
Sitemap	declared in robots.txt

Where to get this fixed

Leese & Nagle’s lowest-scoring pillars among those we publish remediation guidance for:

• Visibility (0/100) — read topical authority on why ranking breadth across a sector beats chasing single terms. Background on analysing this pillar: visibility.
• AI search presence (0/100) — read generative engine optimisation on getting named by the answer engines this pillar measures. Background on analysing this pillar: ai search presence.

↑ Ranked aboveConnells Bristol#15 · 44/100 Full indexAll 18 firms ↓ Ranked belowEdison Ford#17 · 40/100

---

How this is measured: see the index methodology, and the statistical methods behind each pillar. This index is published by PYC; if you want this score moved, start here.