Digital Visibility Score: 40 / 100 · Rank 17 of 18
Measured 3 October 2026 via the PYC Bristol Estate Agent Digital Visibility Index. Every figure is objective and reproducible from the methodology . Spotted an error? Request a correction .
Each pillar scored 0–100 against the sector median for this index. The final column is this firm's distance from that median.
Pillar performance against the sector median. Bars right of centre are above the median, left are below.
Speed & CWV -20 Technical -13 Local presence -14.5 Visibility -13 AI search presence 0 Content & trust -47
These are specific, checkable faults on the site — not opinions about it.
Worth fixing No structured data on the homepage Nothing tells a search engine or an assistant what this business is, where it is, or what it does — in machine-readable terms.
Ranks for 0 of 12 keywords, in the local 3-pack for 0 keywords.
Keyword Position estate agents Bristol not in top 100 best estate agents Bristol not in top 100 top estate agents Bristol not in top 100 letting agents Bristol not in top 100 sell my house Bristol not in top 100 house valuation Bristol not in top 100 property for sale Bristol not in top 100 estate agent fees Bristol not in top 100 rental properties Bristol not in top 100 estate agents Clifton not in top 100 estate agents Redland not in top 100 letting agents Clifton not in top 100
This firm against the sector median and the index leader, CJ Hole, on every pillar.
Speed & CWV 50 Technical 75 Local presence 69 Visibility 0 AI search presence 0 Content & trust 15
Edison Ford trails CJ Hole by 166 points across 6 pillars, but 45% of that is AI search presence and Content & trust alone.
Named in 0 of 5 AI answers. A domain citation is stronger evidence than a name mention.
✗ Who are the best estate agents in Bristol? ✗ Which estate agent in Bristol would you recommend for selling a house? ✗ Top rated letting agents in Bristol ✗ I am looking for an estate agent in Bristol - who should I contact? ✗ Best estate agents in Clifton, Bristol
Google Business Profile.
Rating 4.6 / 5 Reviews 116 Locations 1 Reviews in last 90 days 1 Address matches website no
What each score is made of. Every input here is in the open dataset , so the arithmetic can be checked rather than taken on trust.
Pillar Score Made up of Content & trust 15 about page: no · people introduced: no · credentials: no · blog or news: no · homepage: 530 words Visibility 0 ranks for 0 of 12 keywords · local 3-pack: 0 Local presence 69 116 reviews · rated 4.6 · 1 new in 90 days Technical 75 HTTPS: yes · page allows indexing: yes · robots.txt allows crawling: yes · sitemap: yes · structured data: no
Speed & CWV: 50/100, below the sector median of 70.
Technical: 75/100, below the sector median of 88.
Local presence: 69/100, below the sector median of 83.5.
Visibility: 0/100, below the sector median of 13.
Content & trust: 15/100, below the sector median of 62.
CJ Hole leads the index with 67/100. The largest gaps are: AI search presence (0 vs 40); Content & trust (15 vs 49); Visibility (0 vs 31).
Build local landing pages for the core keyword basket to lift organic and local-pack appearance.
Publish structured, citable content and entity schema so AI engines surface the business for core local queries.
Introduce the people who do the work, on an about or team page and the credentials that matter in this sector (Propertymark, NAEA, The Property Ombudsman), and refresh stale content.
The firms nearest Edison Ford in this ranking, beyond the two either side.
Recorded alongside the measurement to make it easier to judge, but carrying no weight in the Digital Visibility Score. See the methodology .
Companies House No confident match on the registered name Real-user speed (CrUX) Too little traffic to appear in Chrome’s public dataset Lighthouse (lab, mobile) Performance 54 · accessibility 93 · best practices 88 · SEO 100 — biggest losses: Use efficient cache lifetimes; Network dependency tree; Largest Contentful Paint Backlinks 61 referring domains · 446 links · rank 94 Site structure 1 pages crawled · 7 internal links per page · 14% of links use a generic anchor · 0 sitemap pages not reachable by following links Sitemap 1 URLs listed · declared in robots.txt · no lastmod dates · 1 of 1 sampled URLs resolve
Edison Ford’s lowest-scoring pillars among those we publish remediation guidance for:
How this is measured: see the index methodology , and the statistical methods behind each pillar. This index is published by PYC ; if you want this score moved, start here .